Anticoagulation of patients on chronic warfarin undergoing arrhythmia device surgery: wide variability of perioperative bridging in Canada.
Research article published in Heart rhythm (2009)
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In patients undergoing cardiac rhythm device surgery, it is common practice to discontinue oral anticoagulation and to perform heparin bridging in order to reduce the risk of bleeding and minimize the risk of thromboembolic events. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the perioperative anticoagulation strategies currently in use. METHODS: A survey presented four clinical scenarios of patients on oral anticoagulation undergoing cardiac rhythm device surgery. The scenarios represented a gradient of perceived thromboembolic risk based on the presence of atrial fibrillation, a mechanical heart valve, previous stroke, and the remainder of the CHADS(2) risk factors (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age >75 years, diabetes, previous stroke or transient ischemic attack). Respondents were offered six options that included discontinuing oral anticoagulation without heparin, three different heparin bridging protocols, and ongoing oral anticoagulation with reduced or therapeutic dose warfarin. RESULTS: Based on responses from 38 (61%) of 62 electrophysiologists surveyed across Canada, 83% of respondents held warfarin without bridging in a low-risk, 78-year-old patient with atrial fibrillation (CHADS(2) score 1). In three higher-risk patient scenarios, 67% to 100% of respondents chose heparin bridging or ongoing warfarin; 38% to 72% of respondents chose heparin bridging, with 23% to 36% choosing variable use of ongoing warfarin. In all three cases where respondents indicated that they would bridge, each of the three heparin regimens was chosen by at least 20% of respondents. CONCLUSION: There is a wide range of approaches to perioperative management in patients on oral anticoagulation undergoing cardiac rhythm device surgery. Clinical equipoise is evident and supports the need for comparative studies.
Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.
Zusammenfassung
Anticoagulation of patients on chronic warfarin undergoing arrhythmia device surgery: wide variability of perioperative bridging in Canada.
Warum dies für die Hirudotherapie relevant ist
Diese Studie befragte Elektrophysiologen in ganz Kanada, um die perioperativen Antikoagulationsstrategien zu ermitteln, die bei Patienten unter chronischer Warfarin-Therapie im Rahmen von Arrhythmie-Geräteoperationen angewandt werden. Sie zeigte eine ausgeprägte Variabilität der Praxis hinsichtlich Heparin-Bridging im Vergleich zur Fortsetzung der oralen Antikoagulation und verdeutlichte damit das klinische Equipoise. Es besteht keine vertretbare Verbindung zur Hirudotherapie, zum Blutegel-Sekretom oder zum Tätigkeitsbereich der American Society of Hirudotherapy in diesem Abstract. Die Untersuchung fokussiert sich ausschließlich auf das perioperative Management mit Warfarin und Heparin. Weder Blutegel noch von Blutegeln stammende Antikoagulanzien wie Hirudin werden erwähnt, sodass der Bezug zum Forschungsschwerpunkt der Gesellschaft vollständig fehlt.
Zitation
Anticoagulation of patients on chronic warfarin undergoing arrhythmia device surgery: wide variability of perioperative bridging in Canada.
Krahn et al. · Heart rhythm, 2009
Verwandter klinischer Kontext
Erfahren Sie, wie diese Forschung mit der klinischen Praxis verknüpft ist
Zur ASH-Bibliothek hinzugefügt: May 28, 2026 · Letzte Aktualisierung der Website: 18. Juni 2026