Amerikanische Gesellschaft für Hirudotherapie

Bloodletting a popular form of treatment that disappeared

Research article published in Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde (2007)

Zuletzt aktualisiert: June 18, 2026Geprüft von: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Research reportArzneimittelentwicklungKeeman JN et al. · Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde, 2007

Abstract

Bloodletting, based on the humoural pathology of Hippocrates and Galen, was done in various ways for thousands of years: phlebotomy, cupping and the use of leeches. There were broad indications for applying this form of treatment. In the 19th century, P.C.A. Louis demonstrated that bloodletting was not an optimal form of treatment for pneumonia. His study was designed in accordance with the first principles of epidemiology. Epidemiology, together with the rise of Virchow's cellular pathology, contributed to the disappearance of bloodletting. The use of leeches still has a place in the medicine of the 21st century in the form of enzymes from the saliva of the leech.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeEnglish AbstractHistorical ArticleJournal Article
Indexed MeSH termsAnimalsBloodlettingHistory, 15th CenturyHistory, 16th CenturyHistory, 17th CenturyHistory, 18th CenturyHistory, 19th CenturyHistory, AncientHistory, MedievalHumansLeechesNetherlands

Zusammenfassung

Bloodletting a popular form of treatment that disappeared.

Warum dies für die Hirudotherapie relevant ist

This historical article reviews bloodletting as practiced for thousands of years through phlebotomy, cupping, and the application of leeches, tracing its foundations in Hippocratic and Galenic humoural pathology and its eventual decline following P.C.A. Louis's epidemiological studies demonstrating its suboptimal efficacy for pneumonia and the rise of Virchow's cellular pathology. The authors note that leech-based therapy persists into the 21st century in the form of salivary enzyme preparations. For ASH's domain, this article provides directly relevant historical context for the evolution of hirudotherapy from a dominant (if now largely discredited) medical practice to a modern, enzyme-focused modality. However, the article is purely historical with no original data, clinical findings, or laboratory research; its value is contextual rather than scientific, and it does not address contemporary hirudotherapy evidence.

Zitation

Bloodletting a popular form of treatment that disappeared

Keeman JN et al. · Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde, 2007

Verwandter klinischer Kontext

Zur ASH-Bibliothek hinzugefügt: May 27, 2026 · Letzte Aktualisierung der Website: June 18, 2026

Diese Website stellt Bildungsinformationen bereit und ist weder eine medizinische Beratung noch eine Diagnose oder Behandlungsempfehlung. Die medizinische Blutegeltherapie ist mit klinisch relevanten Risiken verbunden und sollte ausschließlich von qualifizierten Klinikerinnen und Klinikern unter institutionell genehmigten Protokollen durchgeführt werden. Die FDA-510(k)-Zulassung für medizinische Blutegel ist auf bestimmte Indikationen beschränkt; experimentelle und Off-Label-Diskussionen werden entsprechend gekennzeichnet. Für patientenspezifische Beratung wenden Sie sich an eine qualifizierte Gesundheitsfachkraft.