Amerikanische Gesellschaft für Hirudotherapie

Effectiveness and safety of bivalirudin anticoagulation therapy in adult patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Review published in Medicine (2025)

Zuletzt aktualisiert: June 18, 2026Geprüft von: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Meta-analysisKlinische StudienArzneimittelentwicklungHu et al. · Medicine, 2025

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Compared to heparin, there is limited evidence of the benefits of bivalirudin in the patients with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). METHODS: We searched for studies comparing bivalirudin anticoagulation with heparin anticoagulation in ECMO patients in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases from inception to March 28, 2024. ECMO patients were divided into the bivalirudin experimental group and the heparin control group. Collected data were mortality rate, duration of ECMO, successful decannulation rate, incidence of thrombotic events, incidence of bleeding events, activated partial thromboplastin time values, platelet transfusion requirements, and other indicators for ECMO patients in the bivalirudin and heparin groups. StataMP17 and RevMan 5.4 software for data analysis and visualization were used. RESULTS: A total of 11 papers that met the inclusion criteria were included. Compared to the traditional heparin anticoagulation group, the bivalirudin anticoagulation group had a lower mortality rate (odds ratios [OR] = 0.74, 95% confidence intervals [CI; 0.56, 0.99], Z = 2.01, P = .04) and incidence of thrombotic events (OR = 0.52, 95% CI [0.38, 0.71], Z = 4.11, P < .0001); meanwhile, the ECMO decannulation success rate (OR = 1.87, 95% CI [1.2, 2.92], Z = 2.75, P = .006) was higher, with statistically significant differences between the 2 groups. In ECMO patients, there were no significant differences between bivalirudin and heparin in terms of ECMO duration, incidence of bleeding events, platelet transfusion requirements, and activated partial thromboplastin time, with no statistical significance between the 2. Subgroup analysis suggested that the mortality rate in the veno-venous group was lower than that in the control group, but the difference was not statistically significant (OR = 0.52, 95% CI [0.27, 0.99], Z = 1.99, P = .05). The mortality rate in the non-veno-venous group was lower than that in the control group, with no statistically significant difference (OR = 0.82, 95% CI [0.61, 1.11], Z = 1.26, P = .21). CONCLUSION: Bivalirudin anticoagulation significantly reduced the mortality rate and incidence of thrombotic events in ECMO patients, while significantly increasing the success rate of ECMO decannulation. However, due to clinical heterogeneity and institutional variability in monitoring and transfusion practices, these findings should be interpreted with caution. Further stratified research is needed to confirm these outcomes across different ECMO subgroups.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal ArticleSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
Indexed MeSH termsHumansExtracorporeal Membrane OxygenationHirudinsPeptide FragmentsRecombinant ProteinsAnticoagulantsHeparinAntithrombinsAdultHemorrhageThrombosis

Zusammenfassung

Compared to heparin, there is limited evidence of the benefits of bivalirudin in the patients with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). We searched for studies comparing bivalirudin anticoagulation with heparin anticoagulation in ECMO patients in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library...

Warum dies für die Hirudotherapie relevant ist

This systematic review and meta-analysis of 11 studies compared bivalirudin versus heparin anticoagulation in ECMO patients, finding that bivalirudin was associated with significantly lower mortality (OR 0.74, p=0.04), fewer thrombotic events (OR 0.52, p<0.0001), and higher successful decannulation rates (OR 1.87, p=0.006), with no significant differences in bleeding events, ECMO duration, or platelet transfusion requirements. The abstract identifies bivalirudin as an anticoagulant used in ECMO and makes no reference to hirudin, leeches, or leech-derived compounds; any connection to ASH's domain is indirect at best. Caveat: The authors caution that clinical heterogeneity and institutional variability in monitoring and transfusion practices across included studies limit definitive conclusions, and further stratified research is needed.

Zitation

Effectiveness and safety of bivalirudin anticoagulation therapy in adult patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Hu et al. · Medicine, 2025

Verwandter klinischer Kontext

Zur ASH-Bibliothek hinzugefügt: May 28, 2026 · Letzte Aktualisierung der Website: June 18, 2026

Diese Website stellt Bildungsinformationen bereit und ist weder eine medizinische Beratung noch eine Diagnose oder Behandlungsempfehlung. Die medizinische Blutegeltherapie ist mit klinisch relevanten Risiken verbunden und sollte ausschließlich von qualifizierten Klinikerinnen und Klinikern unter institutionell genehmigten Protokollen durchgeführt werden. Die FDA-510(k)-Zulassung für medizinische Blutegel ist auf bestimmte Indikationen beschränkt; experimentelle und Off-Label-Diskussionen werden entsprechend gekennzeichnet. Für patientenspezifische Beratung wenden Sie sich an eine qualifizierte Gesundheitsfachkraft.