Amerikanische Gesellschaft für Hirudotherapie

Current use and limitations of direct thrombin inhibitors in pediatric ECMO: A European survey

Survey published in Perfusion (2026)

Zuletzt aktualisiert: June 18, 2026Geprüft von: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Research reportArzneimittelentwicklungKlinische StudienGardeton P et al. · Perfusion, 2026

Abstract

IntroductionDirect thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) are an alternative to unfractionated heparin during pediatric ECMO. We aimed to describe their use and limitations across Europe.MethodsFifty-two pediatric EuroELSO centers were surveyed from July to December 2025. Thirty-seven respondents were analyzed across 11 countries.ResultsMost centers (n = 30, 81.1%) were referral sites for pediatric cardiothoracic surgery and 20 (54.1%) also provided non-ECMO mechanical support (i.e., ventricular assist devices [VADs]). Seventeen (45.9%) centers reported having used DTIs for the maintenance of systemic anticoagulation during ECMO at least once over the last years. Of these 17 centers, only 3 (17.6%) use DTIs as a first-line anticoagulant for pediatric ECMO. Most centers (n = 11/17, 64.7%) reserve DTIs for specific situations, such as VAD patients or suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Among the 17 respondents who reported using DTIs, bivalirudin (BIV) was identified as the preferred agent by 16 (94.1%). Dedicated protocols for DTIs management are implemented in 12 (70.6%) out of these 17 centers. Activated partial prothrombin time is the primary assay for monitoring BIV anticoagulation. From the 16 centers using BIV, only 4 (25.0%) reported having specific assays available. The main reported barrier for DTIs implementation was the lack of guidelines and published protocols (n = 14/20, 70.0%).ConclusionAlthough recent studies have discussed the interest in DTIs, their adoption as first-line anticoagulant during pediatric ECMO remains limited. Findings from this survey indicate the need for more evidence of DTIs clinical benefit, as well as robust guidelines regarding their protocolized use during pediatric ECMO.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal Article

Zusammenfassung

European survey across 37 pediatric ECMO centers in 11 countries showed 45.9% have used DTIs (bivalirudin preferred by 94.1%) but only 17.6% use them as first-line; lack of published protocols was the main barrier cited.

Warum dies für die Hirudotherapie relevant ist

This European survey of 52 pediatric EuroELSO centers (37 respondents analyzed across 11 countries) describes current practices and limitations for direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) as alternatives to unfractionated heparin during pediatric ECMO. Only 45.9% of responding centers had ever used DTIs for ECMO anticoagulation, and just 17.6% of those used them as first-line; bivalirudin was the preferred DTI (94.1% of DTI-using centers), most commonly reserved for VAD patients or suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. The main barrier to wider adoption was lack of guidelines and published protocols (70%). The abstract discusses DTIs, including bivalirudin, but makes no mention of hirudin, leech saliva, leech therapy, or any leech-derived substance. There is no defensible connection to ASH's domain of hirudotherapy or the leech secretome based on the abstract alone.

Zitation

Current use and limitations of direct thrombin inhibitors in pediatric ECMO: A European survey.

Gardeton P et al. · Perfusion, 2026

Verwandter klinischer Kontext

Zur ASH-Bibliothek hinzugefügt: May 27, 2026 · Letzte Aktualisierung der Website: June 18, 2026

Diese Website stellt Bildungsinformationen bereit und ist weder eine medizinische Beratung noch eine Diagnose oder Behandlungsempfehlung. Die medizinische Blutegeltherapie ist mit klinisch relevanten Risiken verbunden und sollte ausschließlich von qualifizierten Klinikerinnen und Klinikern unter institutionell genehmigten Protokollen durchgeführt werden. Die FDA-510(k)-Zulassung für medizinische Blutegel ist auf bestimmte Indikationen beschränkt; experimentelle und Off-Label-Diskussionen werden entsprechend gekennzeichnet. Für patientenspezifische Beratung wenden Sie sich an eine qualifizierte Gesundheitsfachkraft.