Amerikanische Gesellschaft für Hirudotherapie

Prevention of deep-vein thrombosis after total hip replacement: direct thrombin inhibition with recombinant hirudin, CGP 39393

Randomized controlled trial published in Lancet (1996)

Zuletzt aktualisiert: June 18, 2026Geprüft von: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Randomized controlled trialArzneimittelentwicklungKlinische StudienEriksson BI et al. · Lancet, 1996

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The frequency of thromboembolism after major orthopaedic surgery continues to be high despite prophylaxis. New agents such as CGP 39393, a recombinant form of hirudin, may be more effective than existing therapies. METHODS: In this double-blind, multicentre, European study the efficacy of three doses of CGP 39393, in comparison with unfractionated heparin, were examined in 1119 patients undergoing elective hip surgery. Patients were randomly allocated to receive by subcutaneous injection either 10, 15, or 20 mg of CGP 39393 twice daily or 5000 IU of heparin three times daily. All treatments were started just before surgery and continued for 8-11 days, until bilateral venography was performed. FINDINGS: The occurrence of thromboembolism was significantly reduced in patients treated with CGP 39393 compared to heparin. The frequency of deep-vein thrombosis was 34.2% in the heparin group as compared to 23.9% (p=0.0113), 18.4% (p=0.0003), and 17.7% (p=0.0001) in the 10 mg, 15 mg, and 20 mg CGP 39393 groups, respectively. At all dose levels, CGP 39393 was more effective than heparin in preventing proximal deep-vein thrombosis. The frequency of proximal thrombosis was 19.6% in the heparin group as compared to 8.5% (p<0.001), 3.1% (p<0.001), and 2.4% (p<0.001) in the 10 mg, 15 mg, and 20 mg CGP 39393 groups, respectively. All treatments were well tolerated. INTERPRETATION: This study indicates that specific inhibition of thrombin by prophylactic CGP 39393 significantly reduces thromboembolic complications in patients undergoing total hip replacement.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeClinical TrialComparative StudyJournal ArticleMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
Indexed MeSH termsAgedAnticoagulantsConfounding Factors, EpidemiologicDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHeparinHip ProsthesisHirudin TherapyHirudinsHumansMale

Zusammenfassung

Lancet RCT in 1119 hip-replacement patients comparing three desirudin doses with unfractionated heparin; DVT 17.7-23.9% with desirudin vs 34.2% with heparin (p<=0.011).

Warum dies für die Hirudotherapie relevant ist

This double-blind, multicenter, randomized trial compared three subcutaneous doses of recombinant hirudin CGP 39393 (10, 15, or 20 mg twice daily) with unfractionated heparin (5000 IU three times daily) in 1119 patients undergoing elective hip surgery, with treatment started just before surgery and continued until bilateral venography. CGP 39393 significantly reduced overall and proximal deep-vein thrombosis compared with heparin at all doses, and all treatments were well tolerated. This is directly relevant to ASH's domain as clinical evidence on recombinant hirudin for thromboembolism prophylaxis. The abstract does not report detailed bleeding rates or long-term outcomes, and does not describe the agent as leech-derived.

Zitation

Prevention of deep-vein thrombosis after total hip replacement: direct thrombin inhibition with recombinant hirudin, CGP 39393.

Eriksson BI et al. · Lancet, 1996

Verwandter klinischer Kontext

Zur ASH-Bibliothek hinzugefügt: May 27, 2026 · Letzte Aktualisierung der Website: June 18, 2026

Diese Website stellt Bildungsinformationen bereit und ist weder eine medizinische Beratung noch eine Diagnose oder Behandlungsempfehlung. Die medizinische Blutegeltherapie ist mit klinisch relevanten Risiken verbunden und sollte ausschließlich von qualifizierten Klinikerinnen und Klinikern unter institutionell genehmigten Protokollen durchgeführt werden. Die FDA-510(k)-Zulassung für medizinische Blutegel ist auf bestimmte Indikationen beschränkt; experimentelle und Off-Label-Diskussionen werden entsprechend gekennzeichnet. Für patientenspezifische Beratung wenden Sie sich an eine qualifizierte Gesundheitsfachkraft.