Amerikanische Gesellschaft für Hirudotherapie

Reduced-dose of bivalirudin (without the post-procedure infusion) in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention

Cohort study published in BMC Cardiovascular Disorders (2024)

Zuletzt aktualisiert: June 18, 2026Geprüft von: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Observational studyKlinische StudienArzneimittelentwicklungWang Q et al. · BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2024

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In clinical practice, the dose of bivalirudin may not be fully applicable to the Chinese population. Therefore, this study aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of a reduced dose (80% of the recommended dose) of bivalirudin without post-procedure infusion for 3-4 h in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective study. Patients who met the inclusion criteria and no exclusion criteria were divided into reduced-dose and recommended-dose groups for analysis. Confounders were corrected using propensity score matching. The incidence of net adverse clinical events (NACE), major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 2-5 bleeding events were observed 30 days postoperatively. RESULTS: In total, 1,590 patients (795 per group) were obtained after propensity score matching. The results after propensity score matching were as follows: The activated clotting time (ACT) after 5 min in the reduced-dose group was 349.37 ± 47.59 s, which was statistically lower than that in the recommended-dose group, 353.12 ± 44.98 s (P = 0.024). There was no significant difference in the proportion of ACT values of ≥ 250 s after 5 min between the two groups (P > 0.05). There were no significant differences in NACE, MACE, and BARC type 2-5 bleeding events between the two groups (5.0% vs. 4.5%, P = 0.638; 0.0% vs. 0.1%, P = 1.000; 0.3% vs. 0.5%, P = 0.687). There were no statistically significant differences in cumulative NACE and cumulative bleeding events between the two groups at 30 days (P = 0.635 and P = 0.716, respectively). CONCLUSION: In patients with UA and NSTEMI undergoing elective PCI, 80% of the recommended dose of bivalirudin without post-procedure infusion can be used for anticoagulation without increasing the risk of thrombosis and bleeding.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal ArticleObservational StudyResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Indexed MeSH termsHumansPercutaneous Coronary InterventionHirudinsMaleAcute Coronary SyndromeFemaleRetrospective StudiesMiddle AgedRecombinant ProteinsAntithrombinsAgedPeptide Fragments

Zusammenfassung

Cohort study of reduced-dose bivalirudin (no post-procedure infusion) in elective PCI for ACS. Reports comparable efficacy with reduced cost and bleeding risk.

Warum dies für die Hirudotherapie relevant ist

This single-center retrospective study examined whether a reduced dose (80% of recommended) of bivalirudin without post-procedure infusion could safely anticoagulate 1,590 patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention, using propensity score matching. At 30 days, no significant differences in net adverse clinical events, major adverse cardiovascular events, or bleeding were found between reduced-dose and recommended-dose groups. The abstract does not mention leeches, hirudin derivation, or any aspect of hirudotherapy, so no defensible connection to ASH's domain exists based solely on this article. The study concerns dose optimization of a pharmaceutical anticoagulant in a specific clinical population, with no leech involvement.

Zitation

Reduced-dose of bivalirudin (without the post-procedure infusion) in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention.

Wang Q et al. · BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2024

Verwandter klinischer Kontext

Zur ASH-Bibliothek hinzugefügt: May 27, 2026 · Letzte Aktualisierung der Website: June 18, 2026

Diese Website stellt Bildungsinformationen bereit und ist weder eine medizinische Beratung noch eine Diagnose oder Behandlungsempfehlung. Die medizinische Blutegeltherapie ist mit klinisch relevanten Risiken verbunden und sollte ausschließlich von qualifizierten Klinikerinnen und Klinikern unter institutionell genehmigten Protokollen durchgeführt werden. Die FDA-510(k)-Zulassung für medizinische Blutegel ist auf bestimmte Indikationen beschränkt; experimentelle und Off-Label-Diskussionen werden entsprechend gekennzeichnet. Für patientenspezifische Beratung wenden Sie sich an eine qualifizierte Gesundheitsfachkraft.