Amerikanische Gesellschaft für Hirudotherapie

Bivalirudin infusion at standard or low regimen during elective percutaneous coronary intervention in high-risk bleeding patients

Randomized trial published in Contemporary Clinical Trials (2025)

Zuletzt aktualisiert: June 18, 2026Geprüft von: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Research reportKlinische StudienArzneimittelentwicklungLi Y et al. · Contemporary clinical trials, 2025

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bleeding complications associated with anticoagulant therapy should receive more attention in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in those considered at high-risk bleeding. The recommended dosage of bivalirudin in clinical guidelines may not be appropriate for East Asian populations. We are performing a trial to investigate the efficacy and safety of a low bivalirudin regimen without prolonging infusion in high-risk bleeding patients with ACS undergoing elective PCI. METHODS: The study is a prospective, open-label, randomized controlled, non-inferiority trial. A total of 2510 patients will be enrolled and randomly (1,1) allocated to either receive the low (80 % of the standard dose) or standard bivalirudin regimen without prolonging the infusion after PCI. The primary endpoint is net adverse clinical events (NACE) at 30 days, which is a composite of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE, including all-cause death, repeat revascularization, stroke, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and stent thrombosis) and any bleeding events defined by the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC). CONCLUSIONS: This proposed study is the first randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a low versus standard bivalirudin regimen during elective PCI in high-risk bleeding patients with ACS. The results may help achieve dose optimization for the use of perioperative bivalirudin in high-risk bleeding ACS patients undergoing elective PCI. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2200064363. Registered on October 4, 2022.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal ArticleClinical Trial Protocol
Indexed MeSH termsHumansHirudinsAcute Coronary SyndromePercutaneous Coronary InterventionPeptide FragmentsRecombinant ProteinsProspective StudiesAntithrombinsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicHemorrhageFemaleMale

Zusammenfassung

Trial protocol comparing standard vs low-dose bivalirudin infusion in high-bleeding-risk PCI patients with ACS. Aims to optimize anti-ischemic vs hemorrhagic balance.

Warum dies für die Hirudotherapie relevant ist

This article describes a prospective, open-label, randomized controlled non-inferiority trial protocol (ChiCTR2200064363) evaluating a low bivalirudin regimen (80% of standard dose) versus standard bivalirudin without prolonged infusion during elective PCI in 2,510 high-risk bleeding ACS patients, with a primary endpoint of 30-day net adverse clinical events. The abstract does not characterize bivalirudin's relationship to hirudin, leeches, or leech-derived compounds. CAVEAT: This is a trial protocol only with no results reported, and no connection to hirudotherapy or the leech secretome is established by this abstract; any relevance to ASH's domain is indirect and unstated.

Zitation

Bivalirudin infusion at standard or low regimen during elective percutaneous coronary intervention in high-risk bleeding patients.

Li Y et al. · Contemporary clinical trials, 2025

Verwandter klinischer Kontext

Zur ASH-Bibliothek hinzugefügt: May 27, 2026 · Letzte Aktualisierung der Website: June 18, 2026

Diese Website stellt Bildungsinformationen bereit und ist weder eine medizinische Beratung noch eine Diagnose oder Behandlungsempfehlung. Die medizinische Blutegeltherapie ist mit klinisch relevanten Risiken verbunden und sollte ausschließlich von qualifizierten Klinikerinnen und Klinikern unter institutionell genehmigten Protokollen durchgeführt werden. Die FDA-510(k)-Zulassung für medizinische Blutegel ist auf bestimmte Indikationen beschränkt; experimentelle und Off-Label-Diskussionen werden entsprechend gekennzeichnet. Für patientenspezifische Beratung wenden Sie sich an eine qualifizierte Gesundheitsfachkraft.