Amerikanische Gesellschaft für Hirudotherapie

Risk factors for thromboembolic events in pediatric patients with ventricular assist devices

Retrospective cohort published in JTCVS Open (2024)

Zuletzt aktualisiert: June 18, 2026Geprüft von: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Research reportKlinische StudienArzneimittelentwicklungAdderley J et al. · JTCVS Open, 2024

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Pediatric patients on ventricular assist devices (VAD) are at risk of thromboembolic (TE) complications. Our objective was to identify factors associated with TE events, including the role of initial anticoagulation strategy and device type in the pediatric VAD population. METHODS: This was a retrospective, single-center review (2005-2022) of children who were implanted with paracorporeal pulsatile (PP), paracorporeal continuous (PC), or a combination of devices. Patient- and device-related factors were collected. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to determine freedom from TE. Cox proportional hazard analysis was conducted to look for factors associated with TE events. RESULTS: Ninety-five patients included with a median age of 0.9 years (interquartile range, 0.3, 5.4); median weight of 8.4 kg (interquartile range, 4.5, 17.8), and 63.2% with noncongenital heart disease. Device breakdown included 47.4% PC, 24.2% PP, and 23.2% combination of devices. Initial anticoagulation was either heparin (61.5%) or bivalirudin (38.5%). In Kaplan-Meier analysis, unadjusted freedom from a TE event was significantly greater in those who received bivalirudin as their initial anticoagulation strategy (P = .02) and PP VADs (P = .02). In multivariate analysis, initial anticoagulation strategy with bivalirudin (hazard ratio, 0.30; 95% confidence interval, 0.12-0.75, P = .01) was associated with a reduced hazard of TE events, whereas PC device strategy was found to be associated with an increased hazard (hazard ratio, 2.78; 95% confidence interval, 1.12-6.88, P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that PC device strategy and heparin as an initial anticoagulation strategy are associated with increased hazard of TE events. Further research is required to understand the interaction between device type and initial anticoagulation strategy.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal Article

Zusammenfassung

Single-center cohort of 95 pediatric VAD patients (2005-2022); bivalirudin as initial anticoagulation was associated with reduced hazard of thromboembolic events (HR 0.30, p=0.01) compared with heparin.

Warum dies für die Hirudotherapie relevant ist

This retrospective single-center review (2005-2022) of 95 pediatric ventricular assist device patients examined risk factors for thromboembolic events, including initial anticoagulation strategy (heparin 61.5% vs. bivalirudin 38.5%) and device type. Multivariate analysis found bivalirudin as initial anticoagulation was associated with reduced thromboembolic hazard (hazard ratio 0.30, 95% confidence interval 0.12-0.75, p=0.01), while paracorporeal continuous devices were associated with increased hazard (hazard ratio 2.78). The authors conclude that paracorporeal continuous device strategy and heparin as initial anticoagulation are associated with increased hazard of thromboembolic events, and that further research is required. The abstract does not mention hirudin, leeches, leech therapy, or the leech secretome, so no connection to hirudotherapy is established.

Zitation

Risk factors for thromboembolic events in pediatric patients with ventricular assist devices.

Adderley J et al. · JTCVS Open, 2024

Verwandter klinischer Kontext

Zur ASH-Bibliothek hinzugefügt: May 27, 2026 · Letzte Aktualisierung der Website: June 18, 2026

Diese Website stellt Bildungsinformationen bereit und ist weder eine medizinische Beratung noch eine Diagnose oder Behandlungsempfehlung. Die medizinische Blutegeltherapie ist mit klinisch relevanten Risiken verbunden und sollte ausschließlich von qualifizierten Klinikerinnen und Klinikern unter institutionell genehmigten Protokollen durchgeführt werden. Die FDA-510(k)-Zulassung für medizinische Blutegel ist auf bestimmte Indikationen beschränkt; experimentelle und Off-Label-Diskussionen werden entsprechend gekennzeichnet. Für patientenspezifische Beratung wenden Sie sich an eine qualifizierte Gesundheitsfachkraft.