Retrospective, Single-Center Cohort Study of Bivalirudin Compared to Unfractionated Heparin in Patients Receiving Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
Clinical research published in Ann Pharmacother (2025)
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), a form of temporary mechanical circulatory support, causes a prothrombotic state due to activation of inflammatory processes via exposure of blood to the circuit. Systemic anticoagulation is recommended to prevent thrombosis. Unfractionated heparin (UFH) and direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) are anticoagulant agents that inactivate thrombin; however, UFH requires antithrombin III (ATIII) for its activity, and patients supported by ECMO are at risk for acquired ATIII deficiency. In addition, heparin may cause heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, complicating therapy. Guidelines on anticoagulant use in ECMO reference UFH as a recommended agent with DTIs as an alternative option. Meta-analyses comparing the 2 agents in ECMO have evaluated efficacy and safety; however, discordant results prompt the need for additional research. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to evaluate differences in bleeding and thrombotic events between UFH and bivalirudin for anticoagulation during ECMO support. METHODS: This study is a retrospective, single-center cohort study conducted at a primary ECMO center and a tertiary academic medical center. RESULTS: Bleeding and systemic thrombosis rates were not different between bivalirudin and UFH (30 vs 33 events, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.89; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.55-1.47, P = 0.7; 12 vs 17 events, HR = 0.68; 95% CI = 0.32-1.42, P = 0.3); however, when controlled for covariates, device thrombosis was lower with bivalirudin (30.2% vs 43.4%, P = 0.017). Time in therapeutic range (TTR) was higher with bivalirudin (69.98% vs 55.5%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: When compared to heparin, bivalirudin for anticoagulation in ECMO was associated with a decreased rate of device thrombosis and greater TTR.
Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.
Резюме
Single-center retrospective cohort comparing bivalirudin to unfractionated heparin for anticoagulation during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Documents bleeding, thrombotic events, and circuit complications.
Почему это важно для гирудотерапии
Данное ретроспективное когортное исследование, проведённое в одном центре, сравнивало бивалирудин с нефракционированным гепарином для системной антикоагуляции во время экстракорпоральной мембранной оксигенации (ЭКМО). Сообщается, что бивалирудин ассоциировался с более низкой частотой тромбоза устройства (30,2% против 43,4%, P=0,017) и более высокой долей времени в терапевтическом диапазоне (69,98% против 55,5%, P<0,001), без значимой разницы в общем кровотечении или системном тромбозе. В аннотации бивалирудин охарактеризован как прямой ингибитор тромбина, однако не упоминаются гирудин, пиявки или гирудотерапия. Из данной аннотации невозможно сделать обоснованное заключение о связи с гирудотерапией или секретомом пиявки, поскольку она не содержит упоминаний какого-либо соединения пиявочного происхождения. Следовательно, исследование не имеет прямой релевантности к сфере ASH.
Цитирование
Retrospective, Single-Center Cohort Study of Bivalirudin Compared to Unfractionated Heparin in Patients Receiving Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.
Lofy T et al. · The Annals of pharmacotherapy, 2025
Связанный клинический контекст
Узнайте, как это исследование связано с клинической практикой
Добавлено в библиотеку ASH: May 27, 2026 · Последнее обновление сайта: 18 июня 2026 г.