Американское общество гирудотерапии

Comparison of Outcomes in Patients Requiring Mechanical Circulatory Support Who Received Cangrelor in Addition to Anticoagulation Versus Anticoagulation Alone

Research article published in Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia (2024)

Последнее обновление: June 18, 2026Рецензент: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Observational studyКлинические исследованияРазработка лекарственных препаратовБезопасность и инфекционный контрольФармакология секрета слюнных желёзMartin TC et al. · Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia, 2024

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety of cangrelor administered concurrently with heparin or bivalirudin in patients on mechanical circulatory support. DESIGN: A single-center, retrospective cohort study of adult patients consecutively admitted between January 2016 and October 2020. SETTING: A tertiary medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients admitted to the cardiovascular intensive care unit put on mechanical circulatory support for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) or non-AMI indications. Patients who received cangrelor underwent percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting during the index event or within the last year. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome was the incidence of major bleeding, defined by the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization criteria, in patients with mechanical circulatory support receiving cangrelor plus anticoagulation with heparin or bivalirudin with or without aspirin versus patients who did not receive cangrelor. Sixty-eight patients were included in the study. Twenty-nine patients received cangrelor, and 39 did not. Cangrelor was not associated with an increase in major bleeding; however, the CI was wide (adjusted hazard ratio 1.93, 95% CI 0.61-6.11; p = 0.262). CONCLUSIONS: Patients receiving cangrelor did not appear to be at higher risk of major bleeding compared to patients not receiving cangrelor. Larger trials should be conducted to better evaluate the safety of cangrelor in patients with mechanical circulatory support.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal ArticleComparative Study
Indexed MeSH termsHumansFemaleMaleRetrospective StudiesAdenosine MonophosphateMiddle AgedAnticoagulantsAgedHeart-Assist DevicesTreatment OutcomePeptide FragmentsHirudins

Резюме

To evaluate the safety of cangrelor administered concurrently with heparin or bivalirudin in patients on mechanical circulatory support.

Почему это важно для гирудотерапии

This retrospective single-center cohort study evaluated the safety of adding cangrelor to anticoagulation (heparin or bivalirudin) in 68 patients on mechanical circulatory support, finding no significant increase in major bleeding with cangrelor use, though confidence intervals were wide. The study is a comparative pharmacology/safety analysis focused on antiplatelet-anticoagulant combinations in critically ill cardiac patients. Bivalirudin appears as one comparator anticoagulant. The abstract contains no mention of leeches, hirudotherapy, hirudin, or the leech secretome; it concerns antiplatelet and anticoagulant safety in mechanical circulatory support. There is no defensible relevance to ASH's domain, and this article is included only for completeness.

Цитирование

Comparison of Outcomes in Patients Requiring Mechanical Circulatory Support Who Received Cangrelor in Addition to Anticoagulation Versus Anticoagulation Alone

Martin TC et al. · Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia, 2024

Связанный клинический контекст

Добавлено в библиотеку ASH: May 27, 2026 · Последнее обновление сайта: June 18, 2026

Этот сайт предоставляет образовательную информацию и не является медицинской консультацией, диагнозом или рекомендацией по лечению. Гирудотерапия сопряжена с клинически значимыми рисками и должна проводиться только квалифицированными клиницистами в рамках институционально утверждённых протоколов. Разрешение FDA 510(k) для медицинских пиявок ограничено определёнными показаниями; обсуждения исследовательского и нелицензионного применения отмечены соответствующим образом. Для индивидуальных медицинских рекомендаций обратитесь к квалифицированному медицинскому специалисту.