Американское общество гирудотерапии

Bivalirudin during percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndromes

Review published in Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy (2018)

Последнее обновление: June 18, 2026Рецензент: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Narrative reviewРазработка лекарственных препаратовLaine M et al. · Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy, 2018

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Anticoagulant therapy is critical to prevent ischemic recurrences and complications in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Unfractionated heparin (UFH), an injectable anticoagulant has several limitations: lack of predictability of its biological efficacy, platelets activation, heparin-induced thrombopenia and bleedings. Bivalirudin, a synthetic direct thrombin inhibitor has biological properties that promised better clinical outcome in ACS patients undergoing PCI. AREAS COVERED: The present review aimed to summarize two decades of randomized clinical trials that compared bivalirudin to UFH in ACS patients treated with PCI. Early trials highlighted a reduction of bleedings with bivalirudin compared to UFH in combination with glycoprotein inhibitors (GPI). Recent studies questioned this reduction given that GPI are less and less used during PCI. Further, trials raised concerns about the risk of stent thrombosis in patients treated with bivalirudin. In light of this data, bivalirudin has been downgraded in international guidelines and appears as a second line anticoagulant agent after UFH. EXPERT OPINION: The highly questioned reduction of bleedings under bivalirudin and the potential risk of stent thrombosis are unwarranted. Based on clinical trials, UFH has no equivalent in terms of anticoagulation in ACS patients undergoing PCI.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal ArticleReview
Indexed MeSH termsAcute Coronary SyndromeAnticoagulantsAntithrombinsHeparinHirudinsHumansPeptide FragmentsPercutaneous Coronary InterventionRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRecombinant ProteinsTreatment Outcome

Резюме

Anticoagulant therapy is critical to prevent ischemic recurrences and complications in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Почему это важно для гирудотерапии

This review summarizes approximately two decades of randomized clinical trials comparing bivalirudin—a synthetic direct thrombin inhibitor—to unfractionated heparin in acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. The abstract indicates that early bleeding reductions with bivalirudin have been questioned as glycoprotein inhibitor use declined, that concerns about stent thrombosis emerged, and that bivalirudin has been downgraded in international guidelines to a second-line

Цитирование

Bivalirudin during percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndromes

Laine M et al. · Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy, 2018

Связанный клинический контекст

Добавлено в библиотеку ASH: May 27, 2026 · Последнее обновление сайта: June 18, 2026

Этот сайт предоставляет образовательную информацию и не является медицинской консультацией, диагнозом или рекомендацией по лечению. Гирудотерапия сопряжена с клинически значимыми рисками и должна проводиться только квалифицированными клиницистами в рамках институционально утверждённых протоколов. Разрешение FDA 510(k) для медицинских пиявок ограничено определёнными показаниями; обсуждения исследовательского и нелицензионного применения отмечены соответствующим образом. Для индивидуальных медицинских рекомендаций обратитесь к квалифицированному медицинскому специалисту.