Американское общество гирудотерапии

Bivalirudin or heparin for systemic anticoagulation during pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: Multicenter retrospective study

Research article published in Thrombosis research (2023)

Последнее обновление: June 18, 2026Рецензент: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Observational studyРазработка лекарственных препаратовHamzah M et al. · Thrombosis research, 2023

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study is to evaluate the outcomes of unfractionated heparin (UFH) compared to bivalirudin anticoagulation in pediatric ExtraCorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO). METHODS: A multicenter retrospective study, that included pediatric patients <18 years of age, who were supported on ECMO between June 2017 and May 2020. Patients treated with UFH were matched 2:1 by age and type of ECMO support to the bivalirudin group. RESULTS: The bivalirudin group (75 patients) were matched to 150 patients treated with UFH. Baseline characteristics and comorbidities of the two groups were similar. Veno-Arterial ECMO was the most common mode (141/225 [63 %]) followed by extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (48/225 [21 %]). Bivalirudin treatment was associated with lower odds of bleeding events (aOR 0.23, 95%CI 0.12-0.45, p < 0.001) and lower odds of thrombotic events (aOR 0.48, 95%CI 0.23-0.98, p = 0.045). Patients who received bivalirudin had lesser odds for transfusion with fresh frozen plasma, and platelets (aOR 0.26, CI 0.12-0.57, p ≤0.001 and aOR 0.28, CI 0.15-0.53, p < 0.001, respectively). After adjusting for the type of ECMO support and adjusting for age, bivalirudin was associated with a decrease in hospital mortality by 50 % compared to the UFH group (aOR 0.50, 95%CI 0.27-0.93, p = 0.028). Similarly, for neurological disability at time of discharge, bivalirudin was associated with higher odds of intact neurological outcomes compared to UFH (OR 1.99 [95%CI 1.13-3.51], p = 0.017). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that effective anticoagulation can be achieved with bivalirudin, which was associated with lesser odds of bleeding events and utilization of blood products. Bivalirudin, in comparison with UFH, was associated with greater odds of hospital survival and intact neurological function at the time of discharge. A prospective randomized trial is required to validate the results of this study.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal ArticleMulticenter Study
Indexed MeSH termsHumansExtracorporeal Membrane OxygenationHirudinsRetrospective StudiesPeptide FragmentsMaleFemaleHeparinRecombinant ProteinsAnticoagulantsChildChild, Preschool

Резюме

Bivalirudin or heparin for systemic anticoagulation during pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: Multicenter retrospective study.

Почему это важно для гирудотерапии

This multicenter retrospective study compared bivalirudin to unfractionated heparin (UFH) for systemic anticoagulation in pediatric ECMO patients (75 bivalirudin matched 2:1 to 150 UFH). Bivalirudin was associated with lower odds of bleeding events (aOR 0.23), thrombotic events (aOR 0.48), blood product transfusions, hospital mortality (aOR 0.50), and better neurological outcomes at discharge. The abstract does not mention hirudin, medicinal leeches, or any leech-derived product, so no defensible connection to ASH's hirudotherapy domain can be drawn from this source. The study is retrospective and non-randomized, and the authors call for a prospective randomized trial to validate results.

Цитирование

Bivalirudin or heparin for systemic anticoagulation during pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: Multicenter retrospective study

Hamzah M et al. · Thrombosis research, 2023

Связанный клинический контекст

Узнайте, как это исследование связано с клинической практикой

Добавлено в библиотеку ASH: May 27, 2026 · Последнее обновление сайта: June 18, 2026

Этот сайт предоставляет образовательную информацию и не является медицинской консультацией, диагнозом или рекомендацией по лечению. Гирудотерапия сопряжена с клинически значимыми рисками и должна проводиться только квалифицированными клиницистами в рамках институционально утверждённых протоколов. Разрешение FDA 510(k) для медицинских пиявок ограничено определёнными показаниями; обсуждения исследовательского и нелицензионного применения отмечены соответствующим образом. Для индивидуальных медицинских рекомендаций обратитесь к квалифицированному медицинскому специалисту.