Американское общество гирудотерапии

Re-infarction after primary percutaneous coronary intervention

Review published in Current opinion in cardiology (2015)

Последнее обновление: June 18, 2026Рецензент: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Narrative reviewРазработка лекарственных препаратовFrench JK et al. · Current opinion in cardiology, 2015

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Thrombus formation, usually on a ruptured atherosclerotic plaque, is pivotal in the pathogenesis of ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). This thrombus formation provides the milieu for re-occlusion of the infarct-related artery, the main location of re-infarction post-STEMI. Although rates of re-infarction are lower after reperfusion by primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) than after fibrinolytic therapy, re-infarction remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality. RECENT FINDINGS: The predominant cause of re-infarction after primary PCI is stent thrombosis. Two recent trials [A Prospective, Randomized Trial of Ambulance Initiation of Bivalirudin vs. Heparin ± Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors in Patients with STEMI Undergoing Primary PCI (EUROMAX) and Unfractionated heparin versus bivalirudin in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (HEAT-PPCI)] have each reported higher rates of stent thrombosis in the first 24 h after primary PCI in patients assigned to receive bivalirudin, which affects the balance of risks and benefit of bivalirudin post-STEMI. Also, in a subanalysis of the Platelet Inhibition And Patient Outcomes trial, ticagrelor reduces re-infarction compared with clopidogrel in patients with STEMI after primary PCI. Other nonpharmacological or mechanical interventions during primary PCI, with the exception of newer-generation drug-eluting stents in the Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry, have not affected rates of re-infarction. SUMMARY: Re-infarction remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Re-infarction rates are altered by pharmacological strategy and stent selection in primary PCI. The design of future trials to detect possible treatment differences in relatively low event rates will provide challenges, and may require more novel strategies such as administrative data collection for patient characteristics and key outcomes.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal ArticleReview
Indexed MeSH termsCoronary RestenosisGlobal HealthHumansIncidenceMyocardial InfarctionPercutaneous Coronary InterventionRecurrence

Резюме

Thrombus formation, usually on a ruptured atherosclerotic plaque, is pivotal in the pathogenesis of ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).

Почему это важно для гирудотерапии

This review examines the causes of re-infarction following primary percutaneous coronary intervention, identifying stent thrombosis as the predominant cause and discussing how pharmacological strategy and stent selection alter re-infarction rates. It references two trials (EUROMAX and HEAT-PPCI) reporting higher early stent thrombosis rates with bivalirudin, and a subanalysis in which ticagrelor reduced re-infarction versus clopidogrel. The abstract mentions bivalirudin but contains no reference to hirudin, leeches, leech therapy, or any leech secretome component. Consequently, no defensible connection to hirudotherapy or ASH's domain can be established from this abstract alone; any such link would require external pharmacological knowledge not present in the source.

Цитирование

Re-infarction after primary percutaneous coronary intervention

French JK et al. · Current opinion in cardiology, 2015

Связанный клинический контекст

Добавлено в библиотеку ASH: May 27, 2026 · Последнее обновление сайта: June 18, 2026

Этот сайт предоставляет образовательную информацию и не является медицинской консультацией, диагнозом или рекомендацией по лечению. Гирудотерапия сопряжена с клинически значимыми рисками и должна проводиться только квалифицированными клиницистами в рамках институционально утверждённых протоколов. Разрешение FDA 510(k) для медицинских пиявок ограничено определёнными показаниями; обсуждения исследовательского и нелицензионного применения отмечены соответствующим образом. Для индивидуальных медицинских рекомендаций обратитесь к квалифицированному медицинскому специалисту.