Efficacy and Safety of Reteplase Versus Alteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke Based on Fibrinogen Levels: The RAISE Trial Subgroup

BACKGROUND: The effects of intravenous thrombolytic agents on fibrinogen differ due to structural differences among the agents. Using data from the RAISE (Reteplase Versus Alteplase for Acute Ischemic Stroke) trial, we aimed to investigate the impact of differences in baseline plasma fibrinogen levels on the efficacy and safety of reteplase versus alteplase within 4.5 hours of acute ischemic stroke symptom onset. METHODS: This post hoc subgroup analysis of the multicenter RAISE trial categorized participants by baseline fibrinogen levels: low (<2 g/L), normal (2-4 g/L), and high (>4 g/L). The primary efficacy outcome was excellent functional outcome at 90 days (modified Rankin scale score of 0 or 1). The primary safety outcome was symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage within 36 hours. RESULTS: A total of 1373 patients with acute ischemic stroke were included. Ninety-two in the low fibrinogen group (<2 g/L), 1178 in the normal fibrinogen group (2-4 g/L), and 103 in the high fibrinogen group (>4 g/L). Adjusted risk ratios of primary efficacy outcome were 1.13 (95% CI, 0.97-1.32) for the low fibrinogen group, 1.13 (95% CI, 1.04-1.23) for the normal fibrinogen group, and 1.09 (95% CI, 0.84-1.42) for the high fibrinogen group. The primary safety outcome showed no difference between reteplase and alteplase in the 3 fibrinogen subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with acute ischemic stroke who were treated with either reteplase or alteplase within 4.5 hours after symptom onset, there was no difference observed in the relative efficacy and safety between the 2 groups across the 3 fibrinogen subgroups. However, these findings should be interpreted cautiously and require validation in larger, adequately powered prospective studies. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT05295173.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Peer-reviewed research on safety and infection-control considerations relevant to leech therapy and anticoagulation. Indexed in PubMed and verified against the NCBI record.

Узнайте, как это исследование связано с клинической практикой

More peer-reviewed studies in Безопасность и инфекционный контроль.

• Leech-Assisted Flap Salvage — Systematic Review of 277 Cases — Whitaker et al. (2012)
• Effects of hirudotherapy on liver functions, lipid profile, and insulin sensitivity in rats with metabolic syndrome — Bilden A et al. (2026)
• AIF-1 and RNASET2 Play Complementary Roles in the Innate Immune Response of Medicinal Leech — Baranzini N et al. (2019)
• [Hirudo medicinalis-leech applications in plastic and reconstructive microsurgery--a literature review] — Knobloch K et al. (2007)
• Bacterial symbioses of the medicinal leech Hirudo verbana — Nelson M, Graf J (2012)
• Leech related Aeromonas complex infection after reconstruction with a microvascular forearm flap — Beger B, von Loewenich F, Goetze E, Moergel M, Walter C (2016)
• Aeromonas septicemia after medicinal leech use following replantation of severed digits — Levine SM, Frangos SG, Hanna B, Colen K, Levine JP (2009)
• Outcomes of flap salvage with medicinal leech therapy — Nguyen MQ et al. (2012)
• The role of leech water sampling in choice of prophylactic antibiotics in medical leech therapy — Wilmer A et al. (2013)
• The development and application of mini-barcodes from mitochondrial DNA for identifying medicinal leeches from traditional medicines — Liu Y et al. (2025)

Browse all ASH-analysed research →