Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in the critical care setting: diagnosis and management
Review published in Critical Care Medicine (2006)
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Thrombocytopenia is a common occurrence in critical illness, reported in up to 41% of patients. Systematic evaluation of thrombocytopenia in critical care is essential to accurate identification and management of the cause. Although sepsis and hemodilution are more common etiologies of thrombocytopenia in critical illness, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is one potential etiology that warrants consideration. OBJECTIVE: This review will summarize the pathogenesis and clinical consequences of HIT, describe the diagnostic process, and review currently available treatment options. DATA SOURCE: MEDLINE/PubMed search of all relevant primary and review articles. DATA SYNTHESIS AND CONCLUSIONS: HIT is a clinicopathologic syndrome characterized by thrombocytopenia (>/=50% from baseline) that typically occurs between days 5 and 14 after initiation of heparin. This temporal profile suggests a possible diagnosis of HIT, which can be supported (or refuted) with a strong positive (or negative) laboratory test for HIT antibodies. When considering the diagnosis of HIT, critical care professionals should monitor platelet counts in patients who are at risk for HIT and carefully evaluate for, a) temporal features of the thrombocytopenia in relation to heparin exposure; b) severity of thrombocytopenia; c) clinical evidence for thrombosis; and d) alternative etiologies of thrombocytopenia. Due to its prothrombotic nature, early recognition of HIT and prompt substitution of heparin with a direct thrombin inhibitor (e.g., argatroban or lepirudin) or the heparinoid danaparoid (where available) reduces the risk of thromboembolic events, some of which may be life-threatening.
Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.
Resumen
Critical-care review of HIT diagnosis (temporal pattern, severity, antibody testing) and treatment with direct thrombin inhibitors (argatroban, lepirudin) or heparinoid danaparoid in ICU populations.
Por qué esto importa para la hirudoterapia
Esta revisión resume la patogenia, el diagnóstico y el manejo de la trombocitopenia inducida por heparina (TIH) en el entorno de cuidados críticos, señalando que el reconocimiento temprano y la sustitución pronta de la heparina por un inhibidor directo de la trombina (como argatrobán o lepirudina) o por el heparinoid danaparoide pueden reducir el riesgo tromboembólico. La relevancia del artículo para el ámbito de ASH es indirecta: la lepirudina se cita en el resumen únicamente como uno de los varios anticoagulantes alternativos, sin mención alguna de la relación de la hirudina con las sanguijuelas, la saliva de sanguijuela o el secretoma de la sanguijuela. ADVERTENCIA: Se trata de una revisión del manejo de la TIH en cuidados intensivos que no contiene datos primarios; la lepirudina se menciona solo como una opción entre varias, y el resumen no incluye ninguna discusión sobre terapia con sanguijuelas, hirudoterapia o compuestos bioactivos derivados de la sanguijuela.
Citación
Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in the critical care setting: diagnosis and management.
Napolitano LM et al. · Critical Care Medicine, 2006
Contexto clínico relacionado
Explore cómo esta investigación se conecta con la práctica clínica
Añadido a la biblioteca ASH: May 27, 2026 · Última actualización del sitio: 18 de junio de 2026