Sociedad Americana de Hirudoterapia

Pharmacological adjuvant therapies in primary coronary interventions: bivalirudin

Review published in Cardiovascular & hematological agents in medicinal chemistry (2013)

Última actualización: June 18, 2026Revisado por: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Narrative reviewDesarrollo de fármacosLupi A et al. · Cardiovascular & hematological agents in medicinal chemistry, 2013

Abstract

The direct thrombin inhibitor bivalirudin has gained popularity in cardiovascular medicine over the past decade because, in comparison with unfractionated heparin, it guarantees a predictable dose-related degree of anticoagulation with a low immunogenic profile and, possibly, with reduced rates of major bleeding complications. In the past bivalirudin has been frequently employed in the management of patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. The REPLACE-2, ACUITY and ISAR-REACT4 studies demonstrated bivalirudin non-inferiority in comparison with unfractionated heparin in terms of ischemic end-points with a reduction of the bleeding rate also in patients acute coronary syndrome without ST elevation. Finally the results of the HORIZONS-AMI study positioned this drug as a first choice anticoagulant during percutaneous coronary interventions in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. In fact the bivalirudin alone regimen, compared to unfractionated heparin plus GP2b3a inhibitors, decreased in-hospital bleeding rates and short and long term mortality. Given the body of clinical evidence, bivalirudin is likely to contend to GP2b3a inhibitors the leading place among the proposed anticoagulation strategies in the setting of acute coronary syndromes. The duration of the bivalirudin infusion after PCI and the optimal oral antiplatelet regimen associated to bivalirudin are important issues to be solved in future randomized controlled studies.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal ArticleReview
Indexed MeSH termsAntithrombinsCardiovascular DiseasesChemotherapy, AdjuvantHirudinsHumansMyocardial InfarctionPeptide FragmentsRecombinant Proteins

Resumen

The direct thrombin inhibitor bivalirudin has gained popularity in cardiovascular medicine over the past decade because, in comparison with unfractionated heparin, it guarantees a predictable dose-related degree of anticoagulation with a low immunogenic profile and, possibly, with reduced rates of major bleeding complications.

Por qué esto importa para la hirudoterapia

This review summarized the role of bivalirudin, described in the abstract as a direct thrombin inhibitor, as an anticoagulant during percutaneous coronary interventions, citing the REPLACE-2, ACUITY, ISAR-REACT 4, and HORIZONS-AMI studies. The abstract reports that bivalirudin demonstrated non-inferiority to unfractionated heparin on ischemic endpoints with reduced bleeding rates, and decreased in-hospital bleeding and short- and long-term mortality in ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Although bivalirudin is categorized under the MeSH term 'Hirudins,' the abstract itself does not mention leeches, hirudin, or hirudotherapy at any point. No defensible connection to applied hirudotherapy or the leech secretome can be drawn from this abstract alone.

Citación

Pharmacological adjuvant therapies in primary coronary interventions: bivalirudin

Lupi A et al. · Cardiovascular & hematological agents in medicinal chemistry, 2013

Contexto clínico relacionado

Añadido a la biblioteca ASH: May 27, 2026 · Última actualización del sitio: June 18, 2026

Este sitio web proporciona información educativa y no constituye consejo médico, diagnóstico ni recomendaciones de tratamiento. La terapia con sanguijuelas medicinales conlleva riesgos clínicamente significativos y debe ser realizada únicamente por profesionales calificados bajo protocolos aprobados institucionalmente. La autorización 510(k) de la FDA para sanguijuelas medicinales se limita a indicaciones específicas; las discusiones sobre uso investigativo y fuera de indicación se señalan correspondientemente. Para orientación médica específica, consulte a un profesional de salud calificado.