Sociedad Americana de Hirudoterapia

Alternate and Emerging Anticoagulation Strategies for Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Scoping Review

Scoping review published in Journal of Clinical Medicine (2026)

Última actualización: June 18, 2026Revisado por: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Narrative reviewDesarrollo de fármacosEnsayos clínicosKumar A et al. · Journal of Clinical Medicine, 2026

Abstract

Background: Unfractionated heparin (UFH) remains the standard anticoagulant for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), despite complications, such as heparin resistance, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, bleeding and variable pharmacokinetics. This has prompted the search for alternative and novel anticoagulation strategies, including pharmacologic agents, circuit modifications, and monitoring approaches. This scoping review aimed to map the breadth and characteristics of evidence on ECMO anticoagulation strategies beyond UFH. Methods: A comprehensive search of peer-reviewed and gray literature was conducted across PubMed, Cochrane, Clinical Trials, WHO Trials Registry, and conference abstracts through manual searches in key journals. Clinical, pre-clinical, and gray literature studies evaluating pharmacologic agents, anticoagulation-free or heparin-sparing, biocompatible circuits, and monitoring innovations were included. Data were charted and synthesized descriptively to identify trends, gaps, and emerging directions. Results: A total of 269 records were included. Evidence was highly heterogeneous among study designs, populations, ECMO modalities, and outcome definitions. Most clinical studies were retrospective cohorts and adult-centered, with limited multicenter randomized controlled trials and underrepresentation of neonatal and pediatric populations. Direct thrombin inhibitors were frequently studied and clinically implemented alternatives to UFH. Other agents, including nafamostat mesylate, prostaglandin E1, and factor pathway inhibitors remain early in clinical investigation. Anticoagulation-free strategies and biocompatible circuit technologies were mostly supported through pre-clinical and single-center studies. Monitoring and modeling innovations, like TEG, ROTEM, real-time imaging, and machine learning, are quickly emerging. Conclusions: ECMO anticoagulation is transitioning from UFH reliance toward diversified and personalized strategies. Future research should prioritize multicenter randomized controlled trials, standardize protocols, expand to neonatal and pediatric investigation, and integrate strategies.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal ArticleReview

Resumen

Scoping review of 269 studies mapping alternatives to unfractionated heparin for ECMO anticoagulation; direct thrombin inhibitors (bivalirudin, argatroban) emerge as the most frequently studied and clinically implemented alternative class.

Por qué esto importa para la hirudoterapia

This scoping review maps the breadth of evidence on alternative anticoagulation strategies for ECMO beyond unfractionated heparin, including direct thrombin inhibitors, nafamostat mesylate, prostaglandins, factor pathway inhibitors, biocompatible circuits, and monitoring innovations across 269 records. The article has limited relevance to ASH's domain: while direct thrombin inhibitors—the pharmacological class encompassing recombinant hirudin (lepirudin)—are discussed as frequently studied UFH alternatives, the abstract does not specifically name lepirudin, hirudin, leeches, or any leech-derived therapy. CAVEAT: This is a scoping review of heterogeneous literature with no new primary data; the evidence base is described as mostly retrospective and adult-centered with limited RCTs. No direct leech or hirudotherapy content is present, and any relevance is through the broader direct thrombin inhibitor class.

Citación

Alternate and Emerging Anticoagulation Strategies for Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Scoping Review.

Kumar A et al. · Journal of Clinical Medicine, 2026

Contexto clínico relacionado

Añadido a la biblioteca ASH: May 27, 2026 · Última actualización del sitio: June 18, 2026

Este sitio web proporciona información educativa y no constituye consejo médico, diagnóstico ni recomendaciones de tratamiento. La terapia con sanguijuelas medicinales conlleva riesgos clínicamente significativos y debe ser realizada únicamente por profesionales calificados bajo protocolos aprobados institucionalmente. La autorización 510(k) de la FDA para sanguijuelas medicinales se limita a indicaciones específicas; las discusiones sobre uso investigativo y fuera de indicación se señalan correspondientemente. Para orientación médica específica, consulte a un profesional de salud calificado.