Current use and limitations of direct thrombin inhibitors in pediatric ECMO: A European survey
Survey published in Perfusion (2026)
Abstract
IntroductionDirect thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) are an alternative to unfractionated heparin during pediatric ECMO. We aimed to describe their use and limitations across Europe.MethodsFifty-two pediatric EuroELSO centers were surveyed from July to December 2025. Thirty-seven respondents were analyzed across 11 countries.ResultsMost centers (n = 30, 81.1%) were referral sites for pediatric cardiothoracic surgery and 20 (54.1%) also provided non-ECMO mechanical support (i.e., ventricular assist devices [VADs]). Seventeen (45.9%) centers reported having used DTIs for the maintenance of systemic anticoagulation during ECMO at least once over the last years. Of these 17 centers, only 3 (17.6%) use DTIs as a first-line anticoagulant for pediatric ECMO. Most centers (n = 11/17, 64.7%) reserve DTIs for specific situations, such as VAD patients or suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Among the 17 respondents who reported using DTIs, bivalirudin (BIV) was identified as the preferred agent by 16 (94.1%). Dedicated protocols for DTIs management are implemented in 12 (70.6%) out of these 17 centers. Activated partial prothrombin time is the primary assay for monitoring BIV anticoagulation. From the 16 centers using BIV, only 4 (25.0%) reported having specific assays available. The main reported barrier for DTIs implementation was the lack of guidelines and published protocols (n = 14/20, 70.0%).ConclusionAlthough recent studies have discussed the interest in DTIs, their adoption as first-line anticoagulant during pediatric ECMO remains limited. Findings from this survey indicate the need for more evidence of DTIs clinical benefit, as well as robust guidelines regarding their protocolized use during pediatric ECMO.
Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.
Resumen
European survey across 37 pediatric ECMO centers in 11 countries showed 45.9% have used DTIs (bivalirudin preferred by 94.1%) but only 17.6% use them as first-line; lack of published protocols was the main barrier cited.
Por qué esto importa para la hirudoterapia
Esta encuesta europea realizada a 52 centros pediátricos de EuroELSO (37 respondedores analizados en 11 países) describe las prácticas y limitaciones actuales respecto a los inhibidores directos de la trombina (IDT) como alternativas a la heparina no fraccionada durante la ECMO pediátrica. Solo el 45,9 % de los centros respondedores habían utilizado alguna vez IDT para la anticoagulación en ECMO, y apenas el 17,6 % de ellos los empleaban como primera línea; la bivalirudina fue el IDT preferido (94,1 % de los centros que utilizaban IDT), reservándose con mayor frecuencia para pacientes con DAV o con sospecha de trombocitopenia inducida por heparina. La principal barrera para una adopción más amplia fue la falta de guías y protocolos publicados (70 %). El resumen aborda los IDT, incluida la bivalirudina, pero no menciona la hirudina, la saliva de sanguijuela, la terapia con sanguijuelas ni ninguna sustancia derivada de la sanguijuela. No existe una conexión defendible con el ámbito de ASH sobre la hirudoterapia o el secretoma de la sanguijuela basándose únicamente en el resumen.
Citación
Current use and limitations of direct thrombin inhibitors in pediatric ECMO: A European survey.
Gardeton P et al. · Perfusion, 2026
Contexto clínico relacionado
Explore cómo esta investigación se conecta con la práctica clínica
Añadido a la biblioteca ASH: May 27, 2026 · Última actualización del sitio: 18 de junio de 2026