Sociedad Americana de Hirudoterapia

Evaluation of bivalirudin-based anticoagulation for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, including patients with COVID-19

Clinical research published in J Extra Corpor Technol (2026)

Última actualización: June 18, 2026Revisado por: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Research reportDesarrollo de fármacosSeguridad y control de infeccionesEnsayos clínicosRaguindin M et al. · The journal of extra-corporeal technology, 2026

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although unfractionated heparin (UFH) has traditionally been used for anticoagulation during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), bivalirudin may be preferred due to fewer complications. A prior medication use evaluation of ECMO patients who received bivalirudin resulted in dosing updates for our pharmacist-directed bivalirudin protocol. This study intended to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bivalirudin for anticoagulation during ECMO support post-protocol initiation. METHODS: This was a retrospective, single-center, pre-post study. Adult patients requiring ECMO support for at least 24 h and who received bivalirudin between January 1, 2015 to July 31, 2018 (pre-group) and May 1, 2019 to June 30, 2021 (post-group) were included. RESULTS: There were 38 patients in the pre- and 35 patients in the post-group. The primary outcome, median time to two consecutive activated partial thromboplastin times (aPTTs) within therapeutic range for the initial goal range, was 8.9 h in the pre- and 14.2 h in the post-group (p = 0.517). In a subgroup analysis of the post-group, the primary outcome was higher in patients with COVID-19 (26.5 vs. 8.6 h, p = 0.018). The median number of dose adjustments to achieve goal aPTT was higher in COVID-19 patients (4 vs. 2, p = 0.017). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that a standardized pharmacist-directed protocol for bivalirudin in ECMO achieves timely therapeutic anticoagulation levels. Patients with COVID-19 trended toward longer times to two consecutive therapeutic aPTTs. Further studies are needed to evaluate dosing strategies in patients with and without COVID-19.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal Article
Indexed MeSH termsHumansHirudinsExtracorporeal Membrane OxygenationPeptide FragmentsRetrospective StudiesMaleFemaleRecombinant ProteinsMiddle AgedCOVID-19AdultAnticoagulants

Resumen

Evaluation of bivalirudin-based anticoagulation during ECMO support across patient cohorts including those with COVID-19, comparing bleeding/thrombosis outcomes against heparin-based protocols.

Por qué esto importa para la hirudoterapia

This retrospective, single-center, pre-post study evaluated a pharmacist-directed bivalirudin dosing protocol for ECMO anticoagulation across 73 patients (38 pre-protocol, 35 post-protocol), reporting that the standardized protocol achieved timely therapeutic aPTT levels, while a COVID-19 subgroup showed longer times to two consecutive therapeutic aPTTs (26.5 vs. 8.6 h, P=0.018) and more dose adjustments. The abstract does not mention hirudin, leeches, or leech therapy, and bivalirudin is discussed solely as an alternative to heparin without any reference to leech-derived compounds. No defensible connection to hirudotherapy or the leech secretome can be drawn from this article. The study is therefore not relevant to ASH's domain.

Citación

Evaluation of bivalirudin-based anticoagulation for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, including patients with COVID-19.

Raguindin M et al. · The journal of extra-corporeal technology, 2026

Contexto clínico relacionado

Añadido a la biblioteca ASH: May 27, 2026 · Última actualización del sitio: June 18, 2026

Este sitio web proporciona información educativa y no constituye consejo médico, diagnóstico ni recomendaciones de tratamiento. La terapia con sanguijuelas medicinales conlleva riesgos clínicamente significativos y debe ser realizada únicamente por profesionales calificados bajo protocolos aprobados institucionalmente. La autorización 510(k) de la FDA para sanguijuelas medicinales se limita a indicaciones específicas; las discusiones sobre uso investigativo y fuera de indicación se señalan correspondientemente. Para orientación médica específica, consulte a un profesional de salud calificado.