Sociedad Americana de Hirudoterapia

Comparison of bivalirudin versus unfractionated heparin for anticoagulation in adult patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

Comparative study published in ASAIO Journal (2022)

Última actualización: June 18, 2026Revisado por: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Research reportEnsayos clínicosDesarrollo de fármacosSheridan EA et al. · ASAIO journal, 2022

Abstract

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) contributes to coagulopathy, necessitating systemic anticoagulation to prevent thrombosis. Traditionally, unfractionated heparin (UFH) has been the anticoagulant of choice, however, due to many inadequacies new evidence suggests benefit with the use of direct thrombin inhibitors. This retrospective cohort sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of bivalirudin compared to UFH in ECMO patients. Primary endpoints included incidence of bleeding and thrombosis. Percent time in therapeutic range (TR), time to achieve TR and number of dose titrations required to maintain TR were calculated to assess efficacy of institutional protocols. Overall incidence of thrombosis was low, with one event in the bivalirudin group and no events in the UFH group. No difference was found in rates of bleeding between groups (6% vs . 10%, P = 0.44). Bivalirudin yielded higher percent time in TR (86% vs. 33%, P < 0.001), faster time to TR (2 vs . 18 hr, P < 0.001) and required fewer dose adjustments to maintain TR (2 vs . 11, P < 0.001) compared to UFH. These results suggest bivalirudin and UFH are associated with similar rates of bleeding and thrombosis in patients requiring ECMO support. Our results demonstrate the favorable pharmacokinetic profile of bivalirudin, and its ability to consistently maintain TR when compared to UFH.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal Article
Indexed MeSH termsAdultAnticoagulantsAntithrombinsExtracorporeal Membrane OxygenationFibrinolytic AgentsHemorrhageHeparinHirudin TherapyHirudinsHumansPeptide FragmentsRecombinant Proteins

Resumen

Single-center retrospective comparison of bivalirudin vs UFH for adult ECMO. Bivalirudin associated with more stable anticoagulation, fewer circuit thromboses, and lower bleeding rates.

Por qué esto importa para la hirudoterapia

This retrospective cohort study compared bivalirudin against unfractionated heparin (UFH) for systemic anticoagulation in patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), with primary endpoints of bleeding and thrombosis incidence. No significant difference was found in bleeding rates (6% vs. 10%, P=0.44) and overall thrombosis was low, but bivalirudin yielded higher percent time in therapeutic range (86% vs. 33%, P<0.001), faster time to therapeutic range (2 vs. 18 hours), and required fewer dose adjustments (2 vs. 11) compared to UFH. The authors conclude bivalirudin demonstrates a favorable pharmacokinetic profile for maintaining therapeutic anticoagulation during ECMO. For ASH's domain, this study has no defensible link to hirudotherapy or the leech secretome—the abstract makes no mention of leeches, hirudin, or any derivation from leech-derived compounds.

Citación

Comparison of bivalirudin versus unfractionated heparin for anticoagulation in adult patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Sheridan EA et al. · ASAIO journal, 2022

Contexto clínico relacionado

Añadido a la biblioteca ASH: May 27, 2026 · Última actualización del sitio: June 18, 2026

Este sitio web proporciona información educativa y no constituye consejo médico, diagnóstico ni recomendaciones de tratamiento. La terapia con sanguijuelas medicinales conlleva riesgos clínicamente significativos y debe ser realizada únicamente por profesionales calificados bajo protocolos aprobados institucionalmente. La autorización 510(k) de la FDA para sanguijuelas medicinales se limita a indicaciones específicas; las discusiones sobre uso investigativo y fuera de indicación se señalan correspondientemente. Para orientación médica específica, consulte a un profesional de salud calificado.