Bivalirudin-based versus conventional heparin anticoagulation for postcardiotomy extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
Retrospective comparison published in Crit Care (2011)
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) after cardiac operations (postcardiotomy) is commonly used for the treatment of acute heart failure refractory to drug treatment. Bleeding and thromboembolic events are the most common complications of postcardiotomy ECMO. The present study is a retrospective comparison of the conventional heparin-based anticoagulation protocol with a bivalirudin-based, heparin-free protocol. Endpoints of this study are blood loss, allogeneic blood product use, and costs during the ECMO procedure. METHODS: A retrospective study was undertaken in the setting of cardiac surgery, anesthesia, and intensive care departments of a university research hospital. Twenty-one patients (12 adults and nine children) who underwent postcardiotomy ECMO from 2008 through 2011 were retrospectively analyzed. The first consecutive eight patients were treated with heparin-based anticoagulation (H-group) and the next 13 consecutive patients with bivalirudin-based anticoagulation (B-group). The following parameters were analyzed: standard coagulation profile, thromboelastographic parameters, blood loss, allogeneic blood products use, thromboembolic complications, and costs during the ECMO treatment. RESULTS: Patients in the B-group had significantly longer activated clotting times, activated partial thromboplastin times, and reaction times at thromboelastography. The platelet count and antithrombin activity were not significantly different, but in the H-group a significantly higher amount of platelet concentrates, fresh frozen plasma, and purified antithrombin were administered. Blood loss was significantly lower in the B-group, and the daily cost of ECMO was significantly lower in pediatric patients treated with bivalirudin. Thromboembolic complications did not differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Bivalirudin as the sole anticoagulant can be safely used for postcardiotomy ECMO, with a better coagulation profile, less bleeding, and allogeneic transfusions. No safety issues were raised by this study, and costs are reduced in bivalirudin-treated patients.
Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.
Resumen
Retrospective comparison of 21 postcardiotomy ECMO patients (12 adults, 9 children); bivalirudin had less blood loss, fewer transfusions and lower daily ECMO cost in pediatric patients versus heparin.
Por qué esto importa para la hirudoterapia
Este estudio comparativo retrospectivo analizó a 21 pacientes con ECMO poscardiotomía (12 adultos, 9 niños) tratados con anticoagulación basada en heparina (n=8) o basada en bivalirudina (n=13). El resumen informa que el grupo de bivalirudina presentó valores de ACT y aPTT significativamente más prolongados, requirió menos concentrados de plaquetas, plasma fresco congelado y antitrombina, tuvo menor pérdida sanguínea y mostró un coste diario de ECMO menor en los pacientes pediátricos, sin diferencias en las complicaciones tromboembólicas. La relevancia para la ASH es indirecta: la bivalirudina es un análogo de la hirudina, pero no se emplearon sanguijuelas ni terapia con sanguijuelas. El estudio es retrospectivo, con grupos pequeños y consecutivos (no aleatorizados), lo que limita la inferencia causal, aunque no se plantearon problemas de seguridad.
Citación
Bivalirudin-based versus conventional heparin anticoagulation for postcardiotomy extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.
Ranucci M et al. · Critical care, 2011
Contexto clínico relacionado
Explore cómo esta investigación se conecta con la práctica clínica
Añadido a la biblioteca ASH: May 27, 2026 · Última actualización del sitio: 18 de junio de 2026