Sociedad Americana de Hirudoterapia

Bivalirudin-based versus conventional heparin anticoagulation for postcardiotomy extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

Retrospective comparison published in Crit Care (2011)

Última actualización: 18 de junio de 2026Revisado por: ASH Editorial Board
Artículo de investigación — revisión de evidenciaReferencia del artículo
Evidence: Observational studyDesarrollo de fármacosEnsayos clínicosRanucci M et al. · Critical care, 2011

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) after cardiac operations (postcardiotomy) is commonly used for the treatment of acute heart failure refractory to drug treatment. Bleeding and thromboembolic events are the most common complications of postcardiotomy ECMO. The present study is a retrospective comparison of the conventional heparin-based anticoagulation protocol with a bivalirudin-based, heparin-free protocol. Endpoints of this study are blood loss, allogeneic blood product use, and costs during the ECMO procedure. METHODS: A retrospective study was undertaken in the setting of cardiac surgery, anesthesia, and intensive care departments of a university research hospital. Twenty-one patients (12 adults and nine children) who underwent postcardiotomy ECMO from 2008 through 2011 were retrospectively analyzed. The first consecutive eight patients were treated with heparin-based anticoagulation (H-group) and the next 13 consecutive patients with bivalirudin-based anticoagulation (B-group). The following parameters were analyzed: standard coagulation profile, thromboelastographic parameters, blood loss, allogeneic blood products use, thromboembolic complications, and costs during the ECMO treatment. RESULTS: Patients in the B-group had significantly longer activated clotting times, activated partial thromboplastin times, and reaction times at thromboelastography. The platelet count and antithrombin activity were not significantly different, but in the H-group a significantly higher amount of platelet concentrates, fresh frozen plasma, and purified antithrombin were administered. Blood loss was significantly lower in the B-group, and the daily cost of ECMO was significantly lower in pediatric patients treated with bivalirudin. Thromboembolic complications did not differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Bivalirudin as the sole anticoagulant can be safely used for postcardiotomy ECMO, with a better coagulation profile, less bleeding, and allogeneic transfusions. No safety issues were raised by this study, and costs are reduced in bivalirudin-treated patients.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeComparative StudyJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Indexed MeSH termsAdolescentAdultAnticoagulantsBlood CoagulationBlood TransfusionCardiac Surgical ProceduresChi-Square DistributionChildExtracorporeal Membrane OxygenationFemaleHeparinHirudins

Resumen

Retrospective comparison of 21 postcardiotomy ECMO patients (12 adults, 9 children); bivalirudin had less blood loss, fewer transfusions and lower daily ECMO cost in pediatric patients versus heparin.

Por qué esto importa para la hirudoterapia

Este estudio comparativo retrospectivo analizó a 21 pacientes con ECMO poscardiotomía (12 adultos, 9 niños) tratados con anticoagulación basada en heparina (n=8) o basada en bivalirudina (n=13). El resumen informa que el grupo de bivalirudina presentó valores de ACT y aPTT significativamente más prolongados, requirió menos concentrados de plaquetas, plasma fresco congelado y antitrombina, tuvo menor pérdida sanguínea y mostró un coste diario de ECMO menor en los pacientes pediátricos, sin diferencias en las complicaciones tromboembólicas. La relevancia para la ASH es indirecta: la bivalirudina es un análogo de la hirudina, pero no se emplearon sanguijuelas ni terapia con sanguijuelas. El estudio es retrospectivo, con grupos pequeños y consecutivos (no aleatorizados), lo que limita la inferencia causal, aunque no se plantearon problemas de seguridad.

Citación

Bivalirudin-based versus conventional heparin anticoagulation for postcardiotomy extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Ranucci M et al. · Critical care, 2011

Contexto clínico relacionado

Añadido a la biblioteca ASH: May 27, 2026 · Última actualización del sitio: 18 de junio de 2026

Este sitio web proporciona información educativa y no constituye consejo médico, diagnóstico ni recomendaciones de tratamiento. La terapia con sanguijuelas medicinales conlleva riesgos clínicamente significativos y debe ser realizada únicamente por profesionales calificados bajo protocolos aprobados institucionalmente. La autorización 510(k) de la FDA para sanguijuelas medicinales se limita a indicaciones específicas; las discusiones sobre uso investigativo y fuera de indicación se señalan correspondientemente. Para orientación médica específica, consulte a un profesional de salud calificado.