Is anticoagulation with bivalirudin comparable to heparin for pediatric extracorporeal life support? Results from a high-volume center
Comparative study published in Artif Organs (2020)
Abstract
There is a paucity of data regarding the use of direct thrombin inhibitors such as bivalirudin for children on extracorporeal life support (ECLS). We sought to compare the outcomes of children on ECLS anticoagulated with bivalirudin versus heparin. Patients transitioned from heparin to bivalirudin were treated as a separate group. A single-institution, retrospective review of all consecutive children (neonate to 18 years) placed on ECLS in the cardiac or pediatric intensive care units was performed (June 2018-December 2019). Data collected included demographics, anticoagulation strategy, number of circuit interventions, blood product use on ECLS, survival to decannulation, and survival to discharge. Fifty-four children were placed on ECLS for a total of 56 runs. Demographics and venovenous versus venoarterial ECLS were similar. The bivalirudin group had longer median duration of support compared to the heparin group--11.0 days [IQR 6.2, 23.1] versus 3.3 days [2.1, 6.2], P < .001. Patients switched from heparin to bivalirudin had a similar duration of support (10.3 days [8.3, 18.3]) as those on bilvalirudin alone. However, there was no difference in red blood cell, fresh frozen plasma, or platelet transfusions. There was no difference in the number of circuit interventions, survival to decannulation or discharge. The freedom to first circuit intervention was longer with bivalirudin compared to heparin. Our data suggest that even with longer pediatric ECLS runs on bivalirudin, there were no differences in the outcomes between the heparin and bivalirudin groups, with longer freedom from first circuit intervention with bivalirudin. While this is the largest reported series comparing children on ECLS anticoagulated with heparin versus bivalirudin, larger studies are needed to determine the optimal anticoagulation strategy for this diverse and complicated group of children.
Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.
Resumen
Largest reported series comparing pediatric ECLS bivalirudin versus heparin showing similar outcomes with longer freedom from first circuit intervention favoring bivalirudin.
Por qué esto importa para la hirudoterapia
Esta revisión retrospectiva de una sola institución comparó los desenlaces de 54 niños en soporte vital extracorpóreo anticoagulados con bivalirudina, heparina, o transicionados de heparina a bivalirudina, recopilando datos sobre intervenciones del circuito, uso de hemoderivados, supervivencia a la decanulación y supervivencia al alta. Los autores no encontraron diferencias significativas entre los grupos en transfusiones, intervenciones del circuito o supervivencia, aunque la bivalirudina se asoció con una mayor libertad hasta la primera intervención del circuito a pesar de una duración mediana del soporte más prolongada (11,0 frente a 3,3 días; p < 0,001). El resumen describe la bivalirudina como un inhibidor directo de la trombina, pero no menciona hirudina, sanguijuelas ni ningún compuesto derivado de sanguijuela, por lo que no existe un vínculo defendible con la hirudoterapia. Se trata de un estudio retrospectivo unicéntrico, no involucra sanguijuelas ni hirudoterapia, y los autores enfatizan la necesidad de estudios más amplios para determinar la estrategia de anticoagulación óptima.
Citación
Is anticoagulation with bivalirudin comparable to heparin for pediatric extracorporeal life support? Results from a high-volume center.
Schill MR et al. · Artificial organs, 2020
Contexto clínico relacionado
Explore cómo esta investigación se conecta con la práctica clínica
Añadido a la biblioteca ASH: May 27, 2026 · Última actualización del sitio: 18 de junio de 2026