Sociedad Americana de Hirudoterapia

Bivalirudin or Unfractionated Heparin for Anticoagulation in Pediatric Patients on Continuous Flow Ventricular Assist Device Support: Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study

Retrospective cohort published in Pediatr Crit Care Med (2022)

Última actualización: 18 de junio de 2026Revisado por: ASH Editorial Board
Artículo de investigación — revisión de evidenciaReferencia del artículo
Evidence: Research reportDesarrollo de fármacosEnsayos clínicosPuri K et al. · Pediatric critical care medicine, 2022

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Bivalirudin is a direct thrombin inhibitor that is being increasingly used for anticoagulation in children after ventricular assist device (VAD) implantation. While the data on bivalirudin use in pulsatile flow VADs are growing, reports on its use in patients on continuous flow (CF) VAD as well as comparisons of associated outcomes with unfractionated heparin (UFH) remain limited. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Single tertiary-quaternary referral center. PATIENTS: All patients less than 21 years old on CF-VAD support who received bivalirudin or UFH for anticoagulation between the years 2016 and 2020. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Clinical characteristics compared between the cohorts included time to target range of anticoagulation, markers of hemolysis, and prevalence of hemocompatibility-related adverse events such as major hemorrhagic complications, ischemic stroke, and pump thrombosis. In 42 unique patients (41 HeartWare HVAD [Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN], one HeartMate 3 LVAD [Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL]) during the study period, a total of 67 encounters of IV anticoagulation infusions (29 UFH and 38 bivalirudin) were retrospectively reviewed. In comparison with use of UFH, bivalirudin was associated with lesser odds of major bleeding complications (odds ratio [OR], 0.29; 95% CI, 0.09-0.97; p = 0.038). We failed to identify any difference in odds of major thrombotic complications (OR, 2.53; 95% CI, 0.47-13.59; p = 0.450). Eight of the patients (28%) on UFH were switched to bivalirudin due to hemorrhagic or thrombotic complications or inability to achieve therapeutic anticoagulation, while two of the patients (5%) on bivalirudin were switched to UFH due to hemorrhagic complications. Bivalirudin was used for a "washout" in eight cases with concern for pump thrombosis-six had resolution of the pump thrombosis, while two needed pump exchange. CONCLUSIONS: Use of bivalirudin for anticoagulation in patients on CF-VAD support was associated with lesser odds of hemorrhagic complications compared with use of UFH. Bivalirudin "washout" was successful in medical management of six of eight cases of possible pump thrombosis.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal Article
Indexed MeSH termsAdultAnticoagulantsAntithrombinsChildHeart-Assist DevicesHemorrhageHeparinHirudinsHumansPeptide FragmentsRecombinant ProteinsRetrospective Studies

Resumen

Bivalirudin in 38 pediatric continuous-flow VAD encounters showed reduced major bleeding (OR 0.29) versus heparin; bivalirudin washout resolved 6/8 pump thrombosis cases.

Por qué esto importa para la hirudoterapia

Este estudio de cohorte retrospectivo comparó los desenlaces asociados con bivalirudina frente a heparina no fraccionada en 42 pacientes menores de 21 años con soporte de dispositivo de asistencia ventricular de flujo continuo a lo largo de 67 encuentros de anticoagulación, evaluando sangrado mayor, complicaciones trombóticas, marcadores de hemólisis, accidente cerebrovascular isquémico y trombosis de bomba. Los autores informan que la bivalirudina se asoció con una probabilidad significativamente menor de complicaciones de sangrado mayor en comparación con HNF (OR 0,29; IC 95% 0,09–0,97; p = 0,038), sin diferencia estadísticamente significativa en las complicaciones trombóticas, y que el «washout» de bivalirudina resolvió la sospecha de trombosis de bomba en seis de ocho casos. El resumen describe la bivalirudina como un inhibidor directo de la trombina, pero no menciona hirudina, sanguijuelas ni ningún compuesto derivado de sanguijuela, por lo que no existe un vínculo defendible con la hirudoterapia. Se trata de un estudio retrospectivo unicéntrico con una muestra relativamente pequeña y no involucra sanguijuelas ni hirudoterapia.

Citación

Bivalirudin or Unfractionated Heparin for Anticoagulation in Pediatric Patients on Continuous Flow Ventricular Assist Device Support: Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.

Puri K et al. · Pediatric critical care medicine, 2022

Contexto clínico relacionado

Añadido a la biblioteca ASH: May 27, 2026 · Última actualización del sitio: 18 de junio de 2026

Este sitio web proporciona información educativa y no constituye consejo médico, diagnóstico ni recomendaciones de tratamiento. La terapia con sanguijuelas medicinales conlleva riesgos clínicamente significativos y debe ser realizada únicamente por profesionales calificados bajo protocolos aprobados institucionalmente. La autorización 510(k) de la FDA para sanguijuelas medicinales se limita a indicaciones específicas; las discusiones sobre uso investigativo y fuera de indicación se señalan correspondientemente. Para orientación médica específica, consulte a un profesional de salud calificado.