Sociedad Americana de Hirudoterapia

Monitoring of argatroban and lepirudin anticoagulation in critically ill patients by conventional laboratory parameters and rotational thromboelastometry — ALicia substudy

Randomized double-blind clinical trial published in BMC Anesthesiology (2018)

Última actualización: 18 de junio de 2026Revisado por: ASH Editorial Board
Artículo de investigación — revisión de evidenciaReferencia del artículo
Evidence: Randomized controlled trialDesarrollo de fármacosEnsayos clínicosBeiderlinden M et al. · BMC Anesthesiology, 2018

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Argatroban or lepirudin anticoagulation therapy in patients with heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) or HIT suspect is typically monitored using the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT). Although aPTT correlates well with plasma levels of argatroban and lepirudin in healthy volunteers, it might not be the method of choice in critically ill patients. However, in-vivo data is lacking for this patient population. Therefore, we studied in vivo whether ROTEM or global clotting times would provide an alternative for monitoring the anticoagulant intensity effects in critically ill patients. METHODS: This study was part of the double-blind randomized trial "Argatroban versus Lepirudin in critically ill patients (ALicia)", which compared critically ill patients treated with argatroban or lepirudin. Following institutional review board approval and written informed consent, for this sub-study blood of 35 critically ill patients was analysed. Before as well as 12, 24, 48 and 72 h after initiation of argatroban or lepirudin infusion, blood was analysed for aPTT, aPTT ratios, thrombin time (TT), INTEM CT,INTEM CT ratios, EXTEM CT, EXTEM CT ratios and maximum clot firmness (MCF) and correlated with the corresponding plasma concentrations of the direct thrombin inhibitor. RESULTS: To reach a target aPTT of 1.5 to 2 times baseline, median [IQR] plasma concentrations of 0.35 [0.01-1.2] μg/ml argatroban and 0.17 [0.1-0.32] μg/ml lepirudin were required. For both drugs, there was no significant correlation between aPTT and aPTT ratios and plasma concentrations. INTEM CT, INTEM CT ratios, EXTEM CT, EXTEM CT ratios, TT and TT ratios correlated significantly with plasma concentrations of both drugs. Additionally, agreement between argatroban plasma levels and EXTEM CT and EXTEM CT ratios were superior to agreement between argatroban plasma levels and aPTT in the Bland Altman analysis. MCF remained unchanged during therapy with both drugs. CONCLUSION: In critically ill patients, TT and ROTEM parameters may provide better correlation to argatroban and lepirudin plasma concentrations than aPTT. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT00798525 , registered on 25 Nov 2008.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal ArticleRandomized Controlled TrialResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Indexed MeSH termsAgedAnticoagulantsArginineBlood CoagulationBlood Coagulation TestsCritical IllnessDouble-Blind MethodDrug MonitoringFemaleHirudinsHumansMale

Resumen

Sub-study of the ALicia RCT in 35 critically ill HIT-suspect patients found rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM CT) and thrombin time correlate better with argatroban/lepirudin plasma concentrations than the conventional aPTT, which performed poorly in this population.

Por qué esto importa para la hirudoterapia

Este subestudio del ensayo aleatorizado doble ciego ALicia analizó sangre de 35 pacientes críticamente enfermos que recibieron argatrobán o lepirudina por sospecha de trombocitopenia inducida por heparina, comparando el aPTT, el tiempo de trombina y los parámetros de ROTEM con las concentraciones plasmáticas de los fármacos. El hallazgo clave fue que el aPTT no se correlacionó significativamente con las concentraciones plasmáticas de ninguno de los fármacos, mientras que el tiempo de trombina y los parámetros de ROTEM (INTEM CT, EXTEM CT) mostraron correlaciones significativas, lo que sugiere que pueden proporcionar una mejor monitorización en pacientes críticos. El resumen no describe la relación de la lepirudina con la hirudina ni menciona sanguijuelas. Para ASH, la conexión con la hirudoterapia no queda establecida por el resumen; el estudio analiza la lepirudina puramente como un inhibidor directo de la trombina en una población de subestudio de tamaño modesto.

Citación

Monitoring of argatroban and lepirudin anticoagulation in critically ill patients by conventional laboratory parameters and rotational thromboelastometry - a prospectively controlled randomized double-blind clinical trial.

Beiderlinden M et al. · BMC Anesthesiology, 2018

Contexto clínico relacionado

Añadido a la biblioteca ASH: May 27, 2026 · Última actualización del sitio: 18 de junio de 2026

Este sitio web proporciona información educativa y no constituye consejo médico, diagnóstico ni recomendaciones de tratamiento. La terapia con sanguijuelas medicinales conlleva riesgos clínicamente significativos y debe ser realizada únicamente por profesionales calificados bajo protocolos aprobados institucionalmente. La autorización 510(k) de la FDA para sanguijuelas medicinales se limita a indicaciones específicas; las discusiones sobre uso investigativo y fuera de indicación se señalan correspondientemente. Para orientación médica específica, consulte a un profesional de salud calificado.