Sociedad Americana de Hirudoterapia

Clinical effects with inhibition of multiple coagulative pathways in patients admitted for acute coronary syndrome

Review published in Internal and Emergency Medicine (2018)

Última actualización: June 18, 2026Revisado por: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Narrative reviewEnsayos clínicosDesarrollo de fármacosCavallari I et al. · Internal and emergency medicine, 2018

Abstract

Platelets and the coagulation cascade play key roles in initiation, amplification, and perpetuation of acute coronary syndromes (ACS). In the past few years, there has been great progress in ACS antithrombotic treatment with the introduction of novel anticoagulants (fondaparinux and bivalirudin), more potent P2Y12 inhibitors (prasugrel and ticagrelor) and protease-activated receptor antagonists (vorapaxar). Nonetheless, patients with ACS frequently have recurrent ischemic events despite the use of currently recommended dual antiplatelet therapy, revascularization procedures as appropriate, and other evidence-based secondary preventive measures. This is the rationale beyond intensification of antiplatelet therapy. However, the major downside of intensive antithrombotic therapy is bleeding. When treating ACS patients, clinicians should find the adequate balance between the reduction of thrombotic events by effective drug treatment and the induction of bleeding that is linked to the use of potent or multiple antithrombotic agents. Numerous antithrombotic cocktails including oral anticoagulants with or without aspirin have been tested in large clinical trials with the goal of further reduction of ischemia and bleeding risk. The aim of this review is to discuss clinical outcomes resulting from inhibition of multiple coagulative pathways in patients with ACS in light of evidence from large randomized controlled clinical trials.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal ArticleReview
Indexed MeSH termsAcute Coronary SyndromeAdministration, OralAnticoagulantsAspirinBlood Coagulation FactorsFondaparinuxHirudinsHumansPeptide FragmentsPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsRecombinant Proteins

Resumen

Reviews simultaneous inhibition of platelet activation and thrombin generation in ACS, including hirudin-derivative direct thrombin inhibitors (bivalirudin) alongside DOACs and P2Y12 inhibitors.

Por qué esto importa para la hirudoterapia

This review discusses clinical outcomes from inhibition of multiple coagulative pathways in acute coronary syndrome (ACS), examining evidence from large randomized controlled trials involving novel anticoagulants including fondaparinux and bivalirudin alongside more potent P2Y12 inhibitors and protease-activated receptor antagonists. The review emphasizes the clinical challenge of balancing effective thrombotic event reduction against bleeding risk when intensifying antithrombotic therapy, and discusses various antithrombotic combinations tested in large clinical trials. For ASH's domain, this review has no defensible connection to hirudotherapy or the leech secretome—the abstract discusses pharmaceutical agents without any mention of leeches, hirudin, or leech-derived compounds. Any relevance would require external knowledge not supported by this abstract.

Citación

Clinical effects with inhibition of multiple coagulative pathways in patients admitted for acute coronary syndrome.

Cavallari I et al. · Internal and emergency medicine, 2018

Contexto clínico relacionado

Añadido a la biblioteca ASH: May 27, 2026 · Última actualización del sitio: June 18, 2026

Este sitio web proporciona información educativa y no constituye consejo médico, diagnóstico ni recomendaciones de tratamiento. La terapia con sanguijuelas medicinales conlleva riesgos clínicamente significativos y debe ser realizada únicamente por profesionales calificados bajo protocolos aprobados institucionalmente. La autorización 510(k) de la FDA para sanguijuelas medicinales se limita a indicaciones específicas; las discusiones sobre uso investigativo y fuera de indicación se señalan correspondientemente. Para orientación médica específica, consulte a un profesional de salud calificado.