Direct thrombin inhibitors for management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in patients receiving renal replacement therapy: comparison of clinical outcomes.
Research article published in American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (2012)
Abstract
PURPOSE: The clinical outcomes of patients receiving renal replacement therapy (RRT) and treated with direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) for the management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) were compared. METHODS: A retrospective evaluation of clinical outcomes of patients receiving RRT with a presumed diagnosis of HIT treated with lepirudin, argatroban, or bivalirudin was conducted. Inpatients at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center from January 1, 1995, through March 1, 2008, were included if they were receiving either continuous or intermittent RRT and argatroban, bivalirudin, or lepirudin; were exposed to heparin within the preceding 100 days (including a heparin-treated pulmonary artery catheter) or had a documented heparin allergy; and had at least one of following: (1) an absolute platelet count of <150,000 cells/μL, (2) a decline in platelets of >50% from baseline before exposure to heparin, or (3) a documented diagnosis of thrombocytopenia. The primary outcome assessed was a triple composite endpoint of thrombosis, hemorrhage, and inhospital mortality. A secondary assessment compared the pharmacodynamic relationship between activated partial thromboplastin time and the triple composite. RESULTS: For the primary endpoint, there was no statistically significant difference observed among DTIs. In patients receiving RRT, a lack of a previous heparin allergy, the degree of International Normalized Ratio elevation, and lower serum albumin were significantly correlated with increased morbidity and the occurrence of the composite endpoint. CONCLUSION: No differences in adverse events or other clinical outcomes were observed in this retrospective evaluation of DTI use in patients receiving RRT with presumed HIT.
Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.
Resumen
The clinical outcomes of patients receiving renal replacement therapy (RRT) and treated with direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) for the management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) were compared. A retrospective evaluation of clinical outcomes of patients receiving RRT with a presumed...
Por qué esto importa para la hirudoterapia
Este estudio retrospectivo comparó los desenlaces clínicos en pacientes que recibían terapia de reemplazo renal tratados con inhibidores directos de la trombina —lepirudina, argatrobán o bivalirudina— por presunta trombocitopenia inducida por heparina, sin encontrar diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre los agentes para un criterio de valoración compuesto de trombosis, hemorragia y mortalidad hospitalaria. El estudio es directamente relevante para la hirudoterapia porque la lepirudina es hirudina recombinante derivada de Hirudo medicinalis (la sanguijuela medicinal), y examinar cómo se comporta este anticoagulante derivado del secretoma de la sanguijuela en pacientes con compromiso renal informa tanto la práctica clínica como la comprensión de los tratamientos basados en hirudina. Una salvedad importante es que se trató de una evaluación retrospectiva unicéntrica, lo cual limita la generalizabilidad y no permite establecer diferencias definitivas de eficacia o seguridad entre los agentes estudiados.
Citación
Direct thrombin inhibitors for management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in patients receiving renal replacement therapy: comparison of clinical outcomes.
Abel et al. · American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, 2012
Contexto clínico relacionado
Explore cómo esta investigación se conecta con la práctica clínica
Añadido a la biblioteca ASH: May 28, 2026 · Última actualización del sitio: 18 de junio de 2026