Amerikanische Gesellschaft für Hirudotherapie

The possible effects of iron loss from bloodletting on mortality from pneumonia in the nineteenth century

Historical / methodology analysis published in J Clin Epidemiol (2021)

Zuletzt aktualisiert: June 18, 2026Geprüft von: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Narrative reviewKlinische StudienBrabin B et al. · Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2021

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate iron losses and disease severity following 19th century bloodletting in patients with pneumonia. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Benefits of bloodletting in pneumonia patients were contested during the 19th century. Although large blood volumes during infection were removed there was no systematic data collection assessing efficacy and knowledge of iron composition of blood was rudimentary. This observational analysis of historical data quantifies iron losses in pneumonia cases in relation to disease severity. RESULTS: Based on one detailed case series average blood volume removed for survivors was 830 mL (range 114-2272 mL), and mean recovery times were shorter in patients bled within 2 days of illness (P < 0.001). Average iron removed was 446 mg with phlebotomy done ≤2 days of illness presentation and 347 mg after >2 days of illness (P = 0.012). Across several European hospitals average case fatality in pneumonia patients receiving phlebotomy was higher than in those treated without phlebotomy (19.9% vs. 12.8%, OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.38-1.74, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Variable efficacy for bloodletting could at least in part be explained by altered iron status.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeHistorical ArticleJournal ArticleReview
Indexed MeSH termsAdultBloodlettingFemaleHistory, 20th CenturyHumansIronIron DeficienciesMaleMiddle AgedPneumonia

Zusammenfassung

Quantitative analysis of 19th-century pneumonia bloodletting showing average 446 mg iron removed per phlebotomy and 19.9% case fatality versus 12.8% without phlebotomy.

Warum dies für die Hirudotherapie relevant ist

This historical review analyzes iron losses resulting from 19th-century phlebotomy in pneumonia patients, finding that average blood volume removed was significant and that case fatality was higher in patients who received phlebotomy versus those who did not. The study examines historical blood-removal practices and their physiological consequences, specifically focusing on phlebotomy. Its relevance to ASH's domain is strictly indirect, as the abstract exclusively discusses phlebotomy and never mentions leeches or hirudotherapy. The connection is limited only to the shared historical concept of blood-removal therapeutics, and no direct link to leeches can be drawn from the provided abstract.

Zitation

The possible effects of iron loss from bloodletting on mortality from pneumonia in the nineteenth century.

Brabin B et al. · Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2021

Verwandter klinischer Kontext

Erfahren Sie, wie diese Forschung mit der klinischen Praxis verknüpft ist

Zur ASH-Bibliothek hinzugefügt: May 27, 2026 · Letzte Aktualisierung der Website: June 18, 2026

Diese Website stellt Bildungsinformationen bereit und ist weder eine medizinische Beratung noch eine Diagnose oder Behandlungsempfehlung. Die medizinische Blutegeltherapie ist mit klinisch relevanten Risiken verbunden und sollte ausschließlich von qualifizierten Klinikerinnen und Klinikern unter institutionell genehmigten Protokollen durchgeführt werden. Die FDA-510(k)-Zulassung für medizinische Blutegel ist auf bestimmte Indikationen beschränkt; experimentelle und Off-Label-Diskussionen werden entsprechend gekennzeichnet. Für patientenspezifische Beratung wenden Sie sich an eine qualifizierte Gesundheitsfachkraft.