Amerikanische Gesellschaft für Hirudotherapie

The open body closed: a rationale for the abandonment of bloodletting

Historical review published in Soc Hist Med (2024)

Zuletzt aktualisiert: June 18, 2026Geprüft von: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Research reportKlinische StudienDrakman et al. · Social history of medicine, 2024

Abstract

This article contains an analysis of the use and abandonment of bloodletting in Sweden 1820-1900. Close readings of over 8,000 yearly reports by Swedish provincial doctors and popular medical handbooks, journals and notes from medical societies have been used, as well as key word searches meant to illustrate overarching tendencies. One result is that quantitative balance between humours was not an aim of therapeutic bleeding in this context. Rather, bloodletting was mainly used to reinstate regular flows in a hydraulic model of the body. It is argued that a shift from focusing on smooth flows to seeing bleeding as blood loss marked a transformation of the medical imagination from working with an 'open', malleable body to a 'closed', fixed body. This helps explain why therapeutic bleeding, for millennia the most important practice in medical practitioners' arsenal, was silently abandoned decades before the breakthrough of bacteriology and scientific medicine.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal Article

Zusammenfassung

Historical analysis of the rationale for abandoning bloodletting in modern medicine.

Warum dies für die Hirudotherapie relevant ist

This article analyzes the use and abandonment of bloodletting in Sweden from 1820 to 1900, drawing on over 8,000 provincial doctor reports, medical handbooks, journals, and medical society notes. The author argues that therapeutic bleeding was primarily aimed at reinstating regular flows in a hydraulic model of the body rather than balancing humours quantitatively, and that a conceptual shift from 'flow restoration' to 'blood loss' explains bloodletting's abandonment before the rise of bacteriology. CAVEAT: No leeches or hirudotherapy are specifically mentioned; the relevance to ASH is purely historical through the broader bloodletting tradition, and the connection to the leech secretome is indirect at best.

Zitation

The open body closed: a rationale for the abandonment of bloodletting.

Drakman et al. · Social history of medicine, 2024

Verwandter klinischer Kontext

Erfahren Sie, wie diese Forschung mit der klinischen Praxis verknüpft ist

Zur ASH-Bibliothek hinzugefügt: May 27, 2026 · Letzte Aktualisierung der Website: June 18, 2026

Diese Website stellt Bildungsinformationen bereit und ist weder eine medizinische Beratung noch eine Diagnose oder Behandlungsempfehlung. Die medizinische Blutegeltherapie ist mit klinisch relevanten Risiken verbunden und sollte ausschließlich von qualifizierten Klinikerinnen und Klinikern unter institutionell genehmigten Protokollen durchgeführt werden. Die FDA-510(k)-Zulassung für medizinische Blutegel ist auf bestimmte Indikationen beschränkt; experimentelle und Off-Label-Diskussionen werden entsprechend gekennzeichnet. Für patientenspezifische Beratung wenden Sie sich an eine qualifizierte Gesundheitsfachkraft.