Amerikanische Gesellschaft für Hirudotherapie

Anticoagulation in the management of neonatal cerebral sinovenous thrombosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Review published in Developmental medicine and child neurology (2018)

Zuletzt aktualisiert: June 18, 2026Geprüft von: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Meta-analysisKlinische StudienArzneimittelentwicklungRossor et al. · Developmental medicine and child neurology, 2018

Abstract

AIM: To determine whether anticoagulation therapy (ACT) in the treatment of neonatal cerebral sinovenous thrombosis (CSVT) improves outcomes, in the presence or absence of pre-existing intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH). METHOD: We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, the Web of Science, and clinical trial databases. We considered data from retrospective and prospective cohort studies, case series, and randomized controlled studies evaluating outcomes of CSVT treated with anticoagulation or no anticoagulation. Studies were included if they involved infants either younger than 28 days of age or younger than 44 weeks postmenstrual age at the time of diagnosis of CSVT in which ACT was considered. RESULTS: Seven non-randomized studies were included in meta-analysis. ACT had no significant effect on mortality before discharge either in the presence or absence of pre-existing ICH, nor on the incidence of extension of pre-existing ICH. ACT was associated with a reduced risk of propagation of thrombus (risk ratio 0.14, 95% confidence interval 0.03-0.72). INTERPRETATION: There are no randomized trials assessing the safety and efficacy of ACT in the treatment of neonatal CSVT. The results of this meta-analysis would justify a position of equipoise and support the need for well-designed randomized controlled trials of ACT in this population. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: No randomized studies have evaluated anticoagulation therapy (ACT) in neonatal cerebral sinovenous thrombosis. ACT may reduce thrombus propagation. No evidence of increased morbidity or mortality with ACT was demonstrated. A position of equipoise is justified, supporting the need for placebo-controlled randomized trials.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal ArticleMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
Indexed MeSH termsAnticoagulantsCerebral HemorrhageHumansInfant, NewbornSinus Thrombosis, Intracranial

Zusammenfassung

To determine whether anticoagulation therapy (ACT) in the treatment of neonatal cerebral sinovenous thrombosis (CSVT) improves outcomes, in the presence or absence of pre-existing intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH). We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, the Web of Science, and clinical trial databases.

Warum dies für die Hirudotherapie relevant ist

This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated whether anticoagulation therapy improves outcomes in neonatal cerebral sinovenous thrombosis, analyzing seven non-randomized studies. It found that anticoagulation may reduce thrombus propagation without increasing mortality or worsening pre-existing intracranial hemorrhage, though no randomized trials exist. The authors call for well-designed placebo-controlled randomized trials in this population. The abstract does not mention leeches, hirudotherapy, hirudin, or any leech-derived compounds. Based solely on this abstract, there is no defensible connection to ASH's domain.

Zitation

Anticoagulation in the management of neonatal cerebral sinovenous thrombosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Rossor et al. · Developmental medicine and child neurology, 2018

Verwandter klinischer Kontext

Zur ASH-Bibliothek hinzugefügt: May 28, 2026 · Letzte Aktualisierung der Website: June 18, 2026

Diese Website stellt Bildungsinformationen bereit und ist weder eine medizinische Beratung noch eine Diagnose oder Behandlungsempfehlung. Die medizinische Blutegeltherapie ist mit klinisch relevanten Risiken verbunden und sollte ausschließlich von qualifizierten Klinikerinnen und Klinikern unter institutionell genehmigten Protokollen durchgeführt werden. Die FDA-510(k)-Zulassung für medizinische Blutegel ist auf bestimmte Indikationen beschränkt; experimentelle und Off-Label-Diskussionen werden entsprechend gekennzeichnet. Für patientenspezifische Beratung wenden Sie sich an eine qualifizierte Gesundheitsfachkraft.