Amerikanische Gesellschaft für Hirudotherapie

Anticoagulation management and monitoring in ECMO: an international survey from the ISTH SSC Subcommittee on Pediatric and Neonatal Thrombosis and Hemostasis

International survey published in Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis (2026)

Zuletzt aktualisiert: June 18, 2026Geprüft von: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Research reportArzneimittelentwicklungKlinische StudienRegling K et al. · Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 2026

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this survey is to assess current practices in anticoagulation management, laboratory monitoring, and hematology involvement in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) patients. METHODS: A cross-sectional international survey distributed between April 2023 to November 2023 to members of Hemostasis and Thrombosis Research Society, International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis, and Extracorporeal Life Support Organization. Respondents were pediatric and adult physicians involved in the care of ECMO patients. RESULTS: Seventy-two survey responses were included with 83.3% of respondents being from an Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Institution. The respondents included both adult (41.7%) and pediatric (34.7%) physicians, as well as those who managed all age groups (23.6%). Approximately 53% reported including hematology as part of the care team. However, the majority reported that the hematologist is involved in complex cases only (72.2%). Respondents reported the routine utilization of an anticoagulation protocol (92%) and transfusion protocol (83%) to guide management decisions during ECMO therapy; however, management practices were variable. Both unfractionated heparin and bivalirudin were reported to be used routinely for anticoagulation at 92.2% and 52.9%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This survey demonstrated that hematology involvement for ECMO patients is still primarily for complicated cases. In addition, unfractionated heparin continued to be the anticoagulant of choice, with no significant changes in laboratory monitoring. Most centers utilize protocols for management, yet wide variability in ECMO management was again highlighted. Continued prospective and collaborative research efforts are needed to make advancements in treatment and outcomes, and to help streamline the care of this complex patient population.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal Article

Zusammenfassung

Survey of 72 ECMO physicians showing unfractionated heparin remains primary anticoagulant (92.2%) but bivalirudin (52.9%) is routinely used by more than half of centers, with wide variability in monitoring practices.

Warum dies für die Hirudotherapie relevant ist

This international cross-sectional survey assessed current practices in anticoagulation management, laboratory monitoring, and hematology involvement during ECMO therapy, receiving 72 responses from pediatric and adult physicians. Unfractionated heparin remained the anticoagulant of choice (92.2%), with bivalirudin used by 52.9% of respondents; the survey highlighted wide variability in ECMO management practices. The article has minimal relevance to ASH's domain: while ECMO anticoagulation sometimes involves HIT management where lepirudin (recombinant hirudin) has historically been relevant, this abstract makes no mention of hirudin, lepirudin, leeches, or any leech-derived therapy. CAVEAT: This is a survey of self-reported practice patterns with no primary clinical outcome data and no leech-related content; any connection to hirudotherapy or the leech secretome is entirely indirect.

Zitation

Anticoagulation management and monitoring in ECMO: an international survey: communication from the ISTH SSC Subcommittee on Pediatric and Neonatal Thrombosis and Hemostasis.

Regling K et al. · Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 2026

Verwandter klinischer Kontext

Zur ASH-Bibliothek hinzugefügt: May 27, 2026 · Letzte Aktualisierung der Website: June 18, 2026

Diese Website stellt Bildungsinformationen bereit und ist weder eine medizinische Beratung noch eine Diagnose oder Behandlungsempfehlung. Die medizinische Blutegeltherapie ist mit klinisch relevanten Risiken verbunden und sollte ausschließlich von qualifizierten Klinikerinnen und Klinikern unter institutionell genehmigten Protokollen durchgeführt werden. Die FDA-510(k)-Zulassung für medizinische Blutegel ist auf bestimmte Indikationen beschränkt; experimentelle und Off-Label-Diskussionen werden entsprechend gekennzeichnet. Für patientenspezifische Beratung wenden Sie sich an eine qualifizierte Gesundheitsfachkraft.