Postprocedural Anticoagulation After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: 1-Year Results From the RIGHT Trial and Meta-analyses

BACKGROUND: The RIGHT trial was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of postprocedural anticoagulation (PPA) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). OBJECTIVES: The authors aimed to report the prespecified 1-year outcomes. METHODS: RIGHT is an investigator-initiated, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, superiority trial conducted in 53 sites across China. Patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction were randomly assigned (1:1) after primary PCI to receive low-dose PPA (enoxaparin, unfractionated heparin, or bivalirudin) or matching placebo for at least 48 hours. Major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) including all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, stent thrombosis (definite), and urgent revascularization (any vessel), were assessed during a 1-year follow-up. RESULTS: Over a median follow-up of 1.0 year (IQR: 1.0-1.0), MACE data were available for 99.2% of participants. MACEs occurred in 4.2% (63/1,494) of the PPA group and 4.9% (73/1,495) of the placebo group (HR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.61-1.21), with no between-group difference in major bleeding (1.3% vs 1.5%; HR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.47-1.62). In the group of enoxaparin vs placebo, we observed reduction of MACEs with enoxaparin (HR: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.30-0.97) with no excess bleeding. Meta-analyses also showed an advantage of enoxaparin over no anticoagulation in reducing MACEs at 30 days (risk ratio: 0.635; 95% CI: 0.399-0.997). CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose PPA after primary PCI was safe but did not reduce ischemic events at the 1-year follow-up. If clinically indicated, our results suggest that enoxaparin may be beneficial and warrants confirmation in future studies. (Comparison of Anticoagulation Prolongation vs. no Anticoagulation in STEMI Patients After Primary PCI [RIGHT]; NCT03664180).

Abstract aus PubMed (NCBI) für den zitierten Eintrag, in der Originalsprache wiedergegeben. Maßgeblich ist die Fassung der Originalpublikation.

Das Abstract wird nicht übersetzt, damit die eigene Wortwahl der Autoren erhalten bleibt.

In the randomized RIGHT trial, low-dose postprocedural anticoagulation (enoxaparin, unfractionated heparin or bivalirudin) after primary PCI for STEMI was safe but did not reduce 1-year ischemic events versus placebo, though enoxaparin suggested benefit.

Erfahren Sie, wie diese Forschung mit der klinischen Praxis verknüpft ist

Weitere begutachtete Studien in der Kategorie „Arzneimittelentwicklung“.

• Hirudotherapie in Medizin und Zahnmedizin — Jha K et al. (2015)
• Blutegeltherapie: eine Geschichte — Hyson J (2005)
• Hirudine der asiatischen medizinischen Blutegelart Hirudinaria manillensis: gleich und doch verschieden — Lukas P et al. (2019)
• Transcriptomic analysis of the salivary gland of medicinal leech Hirudo nipponia — Lu Z et al. (2018)
• Molekulardynamische und pharmakologische Untersuchungen an durch Protein-Engineering erzeugten Hirudin-Varianten von Hirudinaria manillensis und Hirudo medicinalis — Sun Y et al. (2022)
• Zellfreie Synthese der Hirudin-Variante 1 des blutsaugenden Egels Hirudo medicinalis — Wüstenhagen D et al. (2020)
• Produktion von Hirudin-Varianten durch gentechnisch veränderte mikrobielle Zellfabriken — Zhang J, Lan N (2018)
• Hirudin bei heparininduzierter Thrombozytopenie — Lubenow N, Greinacher A (2002)
• Hirudin verbessert die diabetische Nephropathie durch Hemmung der Gsdmd-vermittelten Pyroptose — Han J et al. (2023)
• Hirudin als alternatives Antikoagulans – eine historische Übersicht — Markwardt F (2002)

Alle von der ASH analysierten Studien →