Amerikanische Gesellschaft für Hirudotherapie

Postprocedural anticoagulation after primary percutaneous coronary intervention: 1-year results

RCT 1-year follow-up published in JACC Asia (2026)

Zuletzt aktualisiert: June 18, 2026Geprüft von: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Research reportArzneimittelentwicklungKlinische StudienYan et al. · JACC. Asia, 2026

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The RIGHT trial was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of postprocedural anticoagulation (PPA) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). OBJECTIVES: The authors aimed to report the prespecified 1-year outcomes. METHODS: RIGHT is an investigator-initiated, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, superiority trial conducted in 53 sites across China. Patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction were randomly assigned (1:1) after primary PCI to receive low-dose PPA (enoxaparin, unfractionated heparin, or bivalirudin) or matching placebo for at least 48 hours. Major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) including all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, stent thrombosis (definite), and urgent revascularization (any vessel), were assessed during a 1-year follow-up. RESULTS: Over a median follow-up of 1.0 year (IQR: 1.0-1.0), MACE data were available for 99.2% of participants. MACEs occurred in 4.2% (63/1,494) of the PPA group and 4.9% (73/1,495) of the placebo group (HR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.61-1.21), with no between-group difference in major bleeding (1.3% vs 1.5%; HR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.47-1.62). In the group of enoxaparin vs placebo, we observed reduction of MACEs with enoxaparin (HR: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.30-0.97) with no excess bleeding. Meta-analyses also showed an advantage of enoxaparin over no anticoagulation in reducing MACEs at 30 days (risk ratio: 0.635; 95% CI: 0.399-0.997). CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose PPA after primary PCI was safe but did not reduce ischemic events at the 1-year follow-up. If clinically indicated, our results suggest that enoxaparin may be beneficial and warrants confirmation in future studies. (Comparison of Anticoagulation Prolongation vs. no Anticoagulation in STEMI Patients After Primary PCI [RIGHT]; NCT03664180).

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal Article

Zusammenfassung

1-year follow-up results from postprocedural bivalirudin anticoagulation RCT after primary PCI for STEMI.

Warum dies für die Hirudotherapie relevant ist

This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial evaluated low-dose postprocedural anticoagulation (enoxaparin, unfractionated heparin, or bivalirudin) versus placebo for at least 48 hours after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, reporting 1-year outcomes. The study found that low-dose postprocedural anticoagulation was safe but did not reduce ischemic events at 1 year overall, though a subgroup comparison suggested enoxaparin may be beneficial. No leeches, hirudotherapy, or leech-derived products are mentioned anywhere in the abstract. Therefore, this article has no direct relevance to ASH's domain, and no hirudotherapy connection can be established from the abstract alone.

Zitation

Postprocedural anticoagulation after primary percutaneous coronary intervention: 1-year results.

Yan et al. · JACC. Asia, 2026

Verwandter klinischer Kontext

Zur ASH-Bibliothek hinzugefügt: May 27, 2026 · Letzte Aktualisierung der Website: June 18, 2026

Diese Website stellt Bildungsinformationen bereit und ist weder eine medizinische Beratung noch eine Diagnose oder Behandlungsempfehlung. Die medizinische Blutegeltherapie ist mit klinisch relevanten Risiken verbunden und sollte ausschließlich von qualifizierten Klinikerinnen und Klinikern unter institutionell genehmigten Protokollen durchgeführt werden. Die FDA-510(k)-Zulassung für medizinische Blutegel ist auf bestimmte Indikationen beschränkt; experimentelle und Off-Label-Diskussionen werden entsprechend gekennzeichnet. Für patientenspezifische Beratung wenden Sie sich an eine qualifizierte Gesundheitsfachkraft.