Postprocedural anticoagulation after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction with bivalirudin
Randomized controlled trial published in Circulation (2024)
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Postprocedural anticoagulation (PPA) is frequently administered after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction, although no conclusive data support this practice. METHODS: The RIGHT trial (Comparison of Anticoagulation Prolongation vs no Anticoagulation in STEMI Patients After Primary PCI) was an investigator-initiated, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, superiority trial conducted at 53 centers in China. Patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention were randomly assigned by center to receive low-dose PPA or matching placebo for at least 48 hours. Before trial initiation, each center selected 1 of 3 PPA regimens (40 mg of enoxaparin once daily subcutaneously; 10 U·kg·h of unfractionated heparin intravenously, adjusted to maintain activated clotting time between 150 and 220 seconds; or 0.2 mg·kg·h of bivalirudin intravenously). The primary efficacy objective was to demonstrate superiority of PPA to reduce the primary efficacy end point of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, stent thrombosis (definite), or urgent revascularization (any vessel) within 30 days. The key secondary objective was to evaluate the effect of each specific anticoagulation regimen (enoxaparin, unfractionated heparin, or bivalirudin) on the primary efficacy end point. The primary safety end point was Bleeding Academic Research Consortium 3 to 5 bleeding at 30 days. RESULTS: Between January 10, 2019, and September 18, 2021, a total of 2989 patients were randomized. The primary efficacy end point occurred in 37 patients (2.5%) in both the PPA and placebo groups (hazard ratio, 1.00 [95% CI, 0.63 to 1.57]). The incidence of Bleeding Academic Research Consortium 3 to 5 bleeding did not differ between the PPA and placebo groups (8 [0.5%] vs 11 [0.7%] patients; hazard ratio, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.30 to 1.83]). CONCLUSIONS: Routine PPA after primary percutaneous coronary intervention was safe but did not reduce 30-day ischemic events. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03664180.
Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.
Zusammenfassung
Major STEMI primary-PCI trial investigating postprocedural bivalirudin (leech-derived direct thrombin inhibitor) anticoagulation strategy.
Warum dies für die Hirudotherapie relevant ist
Diese multizentrische, randomisierte kontrollierte Studie (die RIGHT-Studie) verglich die postprozedurale Antikoagulation (PPA) gegen Placebo bei 2.989 Patienten nach perkutaner Koronarintervention bei ST-Hebungs-Myokardinfarkt. Jedes teilnehmende Zentrum wählte eines von drei PPA-Regimen – Enoxaparin, unfraktioniertes Heparin oder Bivalirudin – und die Studie bewertete die Gesamtwirkung der PPA und jedes einzelnen Regimes auf ischämische und Blutungsergebnisse. Das Abstract berichtet, dass die routinemäßige PPA sicher war, aber im Vergleich zu Placebo die ischämischen Ereignisse nach 30 Tagen nicht reduzierte. Das Abstract erwähnt weder Blutegel, Hirudotherapie, Hirudin noch das Egel-Sekretom, sodass diese Studie keine vertretbare Relevanz für das Fachgebiet von ASH besitzt.
Zitation
Postprocedural anticoagulation after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction with bivalirudin.
Yan et al. · Circulation, 2024
Verwandter klinischer Kontext
Erfahren Sie, wie diese Forschung mit der klinischen Praxis verknüpft ist
Zur ASH-Bibliothek hinzugefügt: May 27, 2026 · Letzte Aktualisierung der Website: 18. Juni 2026