Amerikanische Gesellschaft für Hirudotherapie

Postprocedural anticoagulation after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction with bivalirudin

Randomized controlled trial published in Circulation (2024)

Zuletzt aktualisiert: June 18, 2026Geprüft von: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Randomized controlled trialArzneimittelentwicklungKlinische StudienYan et al. · Circulation, 2024

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Postprocedural anticoagulation (PPA) is frequently administered after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction, although no conclusive data support this practice. METHODS: The RIGHT trial (Comparison of Anticoagulation Prolongation vs no Anticoagulation in STEMI Patients After Primary PCI) was an investigator-initiated, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, superiority trial conducted at 53 centers in China. Patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention were randomly assigned by center to receive low-dose PPA or matching placebo for at least 48 hours. Before trial initiation, each center selected 1 of 3 PPA regimens (40 mg of enoxaparin once daily subcutaneously; 10 U·kg·h of unfractionated heparin intravenously, adjusted to maintain activated clotting time between 150 and 220 seconds; or 0.2 mg·kg·h of bivalirudin intravenously). The primary efficacy objective was to demonstrate superiority of PPA to reduce the primary efficacy end point of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, stent thrombosis (definite), or urgent revascularization (any vessel) within 30 days. The key secondary objective was to evaluate the effect of each specific anticoagulation regimen (enoxaparin, unfractionated heparin, or bivalirudin) on the primary efficacy end point. The primary safety end point was Bleeding Academic Research Consortium 3 to 5 bleeding at 30 days. RESULTS: Between January 10, 2019, and September 18, 2021, a total of 2989 patients were randomized. The primary efficacy end point occurred in 37 patients (2.5%) in both the PPA and placebo groups (hazard ratio, 1.00 [95% CI, 0.63 to 1.57]). The incidence of Bleeding Academic Research Consortium 3 to 5 bleeding did not differ between the PPA and placebo groups (8 [0.5%] vs 11 [0.7%] patients; hazard ratio, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.30 to 1.83]). CONCLUSIONS: Routine PPA after primary percutaneous coronary intervention was safe but did not reduce 30-day ischemic events. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03664180.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter StudyJournal ArticleEquivalence Trial
Indexed MeSH termsHumansAnticoagulantsEnoxaparinHemorrhageHeparinMyocardial InfarctionNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPeptide FragmentsPercutaneous Coronary InterventionRecombinant ProteinsST Elevation Myocardial InfarctionTreatment Outcome

Zusammenfassung

Major STEMI primary-PCI trial investigating postprocedural bivalirudin (leech-derived direct thrombin inhibitor) anticoagulation strategy.

Warum dies für die Hirudotherapie relevant ist

This multicenter, randomized controlled trial (the RIGHT trial) compared postprocedural anticoagulation (PPA) versus placebo in 2,989 patients following percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. Each participating center selected one of three PPA regimens—enoxaparin, unfractionated heparin, or bivalirudin—and the study evaluated the overall effect of PPA and each regimen on ischemic and bleeding outcomes. The abstract reports that routine PPA was safe but did not reduce 30-day ischemic events compared to placebo. The abstract does not mention leeches, hirudotherapy, hirudin, or the leech secretome, so this study has no defensible relevance to ASH's domain.

Zitation

Postprocedural anticoagulation after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction with bivalirudin.

Yan et al. · Circulation, 2024

Verwandter klinischer Kontext

Zur ASH-Bibliothek hinzugefügt: May 27, 2026 · Letzte Aktualisierung der Website: June 18, 2026

Diese Website stellt Bildungsinformationen bereit und ist weder eine medizinische Beratung noch eine Diagnose oder Behandlungsempfehlung. Die medizinische Blutegeltherapie ist mit klinisch relevanten Risiken verbunden und sollte ausschließlich von qualifizierten Klinikerinnen und Klinikern unter institutionell genehmigten Protokollen durchgeführt werden. Die FDA-510(k)-Zulassung für medizinische Blutegel ist auf bestimmte Indikationen beschränkt; experimentelle und Off-Label-Diskussionen werden entsprechend gekennzeichnet. Für patientenspezifische Beratung wenden Sie sich an eine qualifizierte Gesundheitsfachkraft.