Impact of heparin-to-bivalirudin bridging time on hospitalization and safety outcomes in PCI for acute coronary syndrome
Cohort analysis published in Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine (2026)
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Bivalirudin is increasingly used during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute coronary syndrome (ACS), but the optimal interval between discontinuing unfractionated heparin (UFH) and initiating bivalirudin remains unclear. This study examined the association between heparin-to-bivalirudin bridging time and clinical outcomes. METHODS: This retrospective cohort included 197 ACS patients undergoing PCI. Bridging intervals were evaluated using two predefined thresholds: Scenario A (≤30 vs. >30 min) and Scenario B (≤20 vs. >20 min). Clinical, laboratory, and procedural data were collected. Outcomes included bleeding events, cardiovascular events, rehospitalization, and composite adverse outcomes. Multivariable logistic regression and binomial regression with generalized estimating equations were performed, and restricted cubic spline analyses assessed non-linear associations. RESULTS: In Scenario A, hospitalization occurred significantly less frequently in the ≤30-min group compared with the >30-min group (8.9% vs. 21.6%). After adjustment, longer intervals were associated with higher hospitalization risk (OR = 3.20, 95% CI: 1.20-8.54; RR = 2.55, 95% CI: 1.15-5.66). No differences were observed for bleeding, cardiovascular events, or composite outcomes. In Scenario B, no significant associations were identified for any outcomes. Spline analyses revealed no dose-response relationship between bridging time and clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: A heparin-to-bivalirudin bridging interval of ≤30 min may reduce hospitalization without increasing bleeding or cardiovascular events, whereas a 20-min threshold offers no clinical advantage. Bridging time may represent a modifiable procedural parameter that warrants further evaluation in prospective randomized trials. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR2400089671.
Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.
Zusammenfassung
Real-world cohort assessing heparin-to-bivalirudin bridging duration in PCI for ACS. Optimal bridging window identified; outcomes improved with longer bivalirudin infusion post-procedure.
Warum dies für die Hirudotherapie relevant ist
Diese retrospektive Kohortenstudie an 197 Patienten mit akutem Koronarsyndrom, die sich einer perkutanen Koronarintervention unterzogen, untersuchte den Zusammenhang zwischen der Bridging-Zeit von Heparin zu Bivalirudin und klinischen Endpunkten wie Blutung, kardiovaskulären Ereignissen und Wiederaufnahme ins Krankenhaus. Das Abstract erwähnt weder Blutegel, Hirudin, Blutegelspeichel, Hirudotherapie noch irgendeine aus Blutegeln abgeleitete Verbindung und enthält keinen historischen oder pharmakologischen Hintergrund zur Herkunft von Bivalirudin. Obwohl der Arzneimittelname unter einer MeSH-Hierarchie erscheint, die Hirudine einschließen kann, bietet der Artikeltext selbst keine Grundlage für eine Verbindung zur Hirudotherapie. Daher lässt sich auf Grundlage dieses Abstracts allein keine vertretbare Relevanz für das Fachgebiet der ASH beanspruchen; jedwede derartige Verbindung wäre eine externe Inferenz.
Zitation
Impact of heparin-to-bivalirudin bridging time on hospitalization and safety outcomes in PCI for acute coronary syndrome.
Wang G et al. · Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2026
Verwandter klinischer Kontext
Erfahren Sie, wie diese Forschung mit der klinischen Praxis verknüpft ist
Zur ASH-Bibliothek hinzugefügt: May 27, 2026 · Letzte Aktualisierung der Website: 18. Juni 2026