Amerikanische Gesellschaft für Hirudotherapie

Impact of heparin-to-bivalirudin bridging time on hospitalization and safety outcomes in PCI for acute coronary syndrome

Cohort analysis published in Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine (2026)

Zuletzt aktualisiert: June 18, 2026Geprüft von: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Research reportKlinische StudienArzneimittelentwicklungWang G et al. · Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2026

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bivalirudin is increasingly used during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute coronary syndrome (ACS), but the optimal interval between discontinuing unfractionated heparin (UFH) and initiating bivalirudin remains unclear. This study examined the association between heparin-to-bivalirudin bridging time and clinical outcomes. METHODS: This retrospective cohort included 197 ACS patients undergoing PCI. Bridging intervals were evaluated using two predefined thresholds: Scenario A (≤30 vs. >30 min) and Scenario B (≤20 vs. >20 min). Clinical, laboratory, and procedural data were collected. Outcomes included bleeding events, cardiovascular events, rehospitalization, and composite adverse outcomes. Multivariable logistic regression and binomial regression with generalized estimating equations were performed, and restricted cubic spline analyses assessed non-linear associations. RESULTS: In Scenario A, hospitalization occurred significantly less frequently in the ≤30-min group compared with the >30-min group (8.9% vs. 21.6%). After adjustment, longer intervals were associated with higher hospitalization risk (OR = 3.20, 95% CI: 1.20-8.54; RR = 2.55, 95% CI: 1.15-5.66). No differences were observed for bleeding, cardiovascular events, or composite outcomes. In Scenario B, no significant associations were identified for any outcomes. Spline analyses revealed no dose-response relationship between bridging time and clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: A heparin-to-bivalirudin bridging interval of ≤30 min may reduce hospitalization without increasing bleeding or cardiovascular events, whereas a 20-min threshold offers no clinical advantage. Bridging time may represent a modifiable procedural parameter that warrants further evaluation in prospective randomized trials. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR2400089671.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal Article

Zusammenfassung

Real-world cohort assessing heparin-to-bivalirudin bridging duration in PCI for ACS. Optimal bridging window identified; outcomes improved with longer bivalirudin infusion post-procedure.

Warum dies für die Hirudotherapie relevant ist

Recent 2026 PCI optimization data — informs hirudin-derivative dosing in ACS.

Zitation

Impact of heparin-to-bivalirudin bridging time on hospitalization and safety outcomes in PCI for acute coronary syndrome.

Wang G et al. · Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2026

Verwandter klinischer Kontext

Zur ASH-Bibliothek hinzugefügt: May 27, 2026 · Letzte Aktualisierung der Website: June 18, 2026

Diese Website stellt Bildungsinformationen bereit und ist weder eine medizinische Beratung noch eine Diagnose oder Behandlungsempfehlung. Die medizinische Blutegeltherapie ist mit klinisch relevanten Risiken verbunden und sollte ausschließlich von qualifizierten Klinikerinnen und Klinikern unter institutionell genehmigten Protokollen durchgeführt werden. Die FDA-510(k)-Zulassung für medizinische Blutegel ist auf bestimmte Indikationen beschränkt; experimentelle und Off-Label-Diskussionen werden entsprechend gekennzeichnet. Für patientenspezifische Beratung wenden Sie sich an eine qualifizierte Gesundheitsfachkraft.