Amerikanische Gesellschaft für Hirudotherapie

The Role of Simulation in Microsurgical Training

Review published in J Surg Educ (2017)

Zuletzt aktualisiert: June 18, 2026Geprüft von: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Narrative reviewKlinische StudienEvgeniou E et al. · Journal of surgical education, 2017

Abstract

Simulation has been established as an integral part of microsurgical training. The aim of this study was to assess and categorize the various simulation models in relation to the complexity of the microsurgical skill being taught and analyze the assessment methods commonly employed in microsurgical simulation training. Numerous courses have been established using simulation models. These models can be categorized, according to the level of complexity of the skill being taught, into basic, intermediate, and advanced. Microsurgical simulation training should be assessed using validated assessment methods. Assessment methods vary significantly from subjective expert opinions to self-assessment questionnaires and validated global rating scales. The appropriate assessment method should carefully be chosen based on the simulation modality. Simulation models should be validated, and a model with appropriate fidelity should be chosen according to the microsurgical skill being taught. Assessment should move from traditional simple subjective evaluations of trainee performance to validated tools. Future studies should assess the transferability of skills gained during simulation training to the real-life setting.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal ArticleReview
Indexed MeSH termsAnimalsClinical CompetenceEducation, Medical, GraduateFemaleHumansInternship and ResidencyMaleMicrosurgeryModels, AnatomicSimulation TrainingUnited States

Zusammenfassung

Categorizes microsurgical simulation models by skill complexity (basic, intermediate, advanced) and analyzes assessment methods, recommending validated assessment tools and skill transferability studies.

Warum dies für die Hirudotherapie relevant ist

This review article assesses and categorizes various simulation models used in microsurgical training according to the complexity of the skills being taught, ranging from basic to advanced levels, and analyzes commonly employed assessment methods from subjective evaluations to validated global rating scales. The review emphasizes the importance of model validation, appropriate fidelity selection, and future research on skill transferability to real-life surgical settings. This article has no direct relevance to hirudotherapy, the leech secretome, or the American Society of Hirudotherapy's domain—it focuses exclusively on surgical simulation modalities and contains no mention of leeches, leech-derived compounds, or hirudotherapy techniques.

Zitation

The Role of Simulation in Microsurgical Training.

Evgeniou E et al. · Journal of surgical education, 2017

Verwandter klinischer Kontext

Erfahren Sie, wie diese Forschung mit der klinischen Praxis verknüpft ist

Zur ASH-Bibliothek hinzugefügt: May 27, 2026 · Letzte Aktualisierung der Website: June 18, 2026

Diese Website stellt Bildungsinformationen bereit und ist weder eine medizinische Beratung noch eine Diagnose oder Behandlungsempfehlung. Die medizinische Blutegeltherapie ist mit klinisch relevanten Risiken verbunden und sollte ausschließlich von qualifizierten Klinikerinnen und Klinikern unter institutionell genehmigten Protokollen durchgeführt werden. Die FDA-510(k)-Zulassung für medizinische Blutegel ist auf bestimmte Indikationen beschränkt; experimentelle und Off-Label-Diskussionen werden entsprechend gekennzeichnet. Für patientenspezifische Beratung wenden Sie sich an eine qualifizierte Gesundheitsfachkraft.