Amerikanische Gesellschaft für Hirudotherapie

Learning, teaching, and training in microsurgery: A systematic review

Systematic review published in Hand Surg Rehabil (2022)

Zuletzt aktualisiert: June 18, 2026Geprüft von: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Systematic reviewKlinische StudienGavira N et al. · Hand surgery & rehabilitation, 2022

Abstract

Numerous microsurgical training techniques and materials have been developed to reduce animal use and training costs. This systematic review aimed to catalog the available microsurgery learning methods on non-living material in order to define an educational program. The PubMed database was searched for English and French articles related to the initial learning of microsurgery with inert, non-living, or digital material and containing the keywords "microsurgery", "non-living", "simulation" and "virtual reality". Among the 488 articles found, 82 were included. This work reports the main microsurgery learning supports. They were classified according to the material used: inert material, cadaveric animal tissues, human cadaver model, virtual reality, and digital technologies. The educational program proposes here is a two-step program that uses non-living material (basic and deepening) before progressing to living models. This initial learning phase teaches basic microsurgical skills (precision, tremor management, and magnification). Then, frequent home training sessions help to maintain the acquired skills. Ethical, organizational, and economic constraints limit access to animal models. Therefore, inert models seem to be ideal support for initial microsurgical learning. The multiplicity of models described makes it possible to achieve progressive learning depending on which models are available.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal ArticleSystematic Review
Indexed MeSH termsAnimalsClinical CompetenceComputer SimulationHumansLearningMicrosurgery

Zusammenfassung

Systematic review of 82 articles cataloging non-living microsurgery learning supports across inert material, cadaveric tissue, human cadaver, virtual reality and digital technologies.

Warum dies für die Hirudotherapie relevant ist

This systematic review cataloged available microsurgery learning methods using non-living, inert, or digital materials, analyzing 82 of 488 identified articles to propose a two-step progressive educational program beginning with non-living models before advancing to living ones. Training supports were classified into categories including inert materials, cadaveric animal tissues, human cadaver models, virtual reality, and digital technologies, with inert models identified as ideal for initial learning. This article has no direct relevance to hirudotherapy, the leech secretome, or the American Society of Hirudotherapy's domain—it contains no mention of leeches, leech-derived compounds, or hirudotherapy techniques.

Zitation

Learning, teaching, and training in microsurgery: A systematic review.

Gavira N et al. · Hand surgery & rehabilitation, 2022

Verwandter klinischer Kontext

Erfahren Sie, wie diese Forschung mit der klinischen Praxis verknüpft ist

Zur ASH-Bibliothek hinzugefügt: May 27, 2026 · Letzte Aktualisierung der Website: June 18, 2026

Diese Website stellt Bildungsinformationen bereit und ist weder eine medizinische Beratung noch eine Diagnose oder Behandlungsempfehlung. Die medizinische Blutegeltherapie ist mit klinisch relevanten Risiken verbunden und sollte ausschließlich von qualifizierten Klinikerinnen und Klinikern unter institutionell genehmigten Protokollen durchgeführt werden. Die FDA-510(k)-Zulassung für medizinische Blutegel ist auf bestimmte Indikationen beschränkt; experimentelle und Off-Label-Diskussionen werden entsprechend gekennzeichnet. Für patientenspezifische Beratung wenden Sie sich an eine qualifizierte Gesundheitsfachkraft.