Is There Bias against Simulation in Microsurgery Training?
Survey study published in J Reconstr Microsurg (2016)
Abstract
Background While other surgical specialties have embraced virtual reality simulation for training and recertification, microsurgery has lagged. This study aims to assess the opinions of microsurgeons on the role of simulation in microsurgery assessment and training. Methods We surveyed faculty members of the American Society of Reconstructive Microsurgery to ascertain opinions on their use of simulation in training and opinions about the utility of simulation for skills acquisition, teaching, and skills assessment. The 21-question survey was disseminated online to 675 members. Results Eighty-nine members completed the survey for a 13.2% response rate. Few microsurgeons have experience with high-fidelity simulation, and opinions on its utility are internally inconsistent. Although 84% of respondents could not identify a reason why simulation would not be useful, only 24% believed simulation is a useful measure of clinical performance. Nearly three-fourths of respondents were skeptical that simulation would improve their skills. Ninety-four percent had no experience with simulator-based assessment. Conclusion Simulation has been shown to improve skills acquisition in microsurgery, but our survey suggests that unfamiliarity may foster bias against the technology. Failure to incorporate simulation may adversely affect training and may put surgeons at a disadvantage should these technologies be adopted for recertification by regulatory agencies.
Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.
Zusammenfassung
Survey of 89 microsurgeons revealed that despite known utility of simulation, only 24% believed simulation measures clinical performance and 94% had no experience with simulator-based assessment.
Warum dies für die Hirudotherapie relevant ist
Diese Studie befragte Fakultätsmitglieder der American Society of Reconstructive Microsurgery, um Meinungen zur Rolle der Simulation in der Bewertung und Ausbildung in der Mikrochirurgie zu erfassen, und stellte fest, dass wenige Mikrochirurgen Erfahrung mit High-Fidelity-Simulation haben und dass die Unvertrautheit Vorurteile gegenüber der Technologie fördern kann. Die Befragung von 89 Teilnehmern ergab, dass zwar 84 % keinen Grund identifizieren konnten, warum Simulation nicht nützlich wäre, jedoch nur 24 % glaubten, dass sie ein nützliches Maß für die klinische Leistung darstellt. Dieser Artikel besitzt keine direkte Relevanz für die Hirudotherapie, das Blutegelsekretom oder das Aufgabenfeld der American Society of Hirudotherapy – es handelt sich um eine reine Meinungsumfrage zu Ausbildungs-Simulationstools und enthält keinerlei Erwähnung von Blutegeln, aus Blutegeln gewonnenen Substanzen oder Hirudotherapie-Techniken.
Zitation
Is There Bias against Simulation in Microsurgery Training?
Theman TA, Labow BI · Journal of reconstructive microsurgery, 2016
Verwandter klinischer Kontext
Erfahren Sie, wie diese Forschung mit der klinischen Praxis verknüpft ist
Zur ASH-Bibliothek hinzugefügt: May 27, 2026 · Letzte Aktualisierung der Website: 18. Juni 2026