Amerikanische Gesellschaft für Hirudotherapie

Pharmacological adjuvant therapies in primary coronary interventions: bivalirudin

Review published in Cardiovascular & hematological agents in medicinal chemistry (2013)

Zuletzt aktualisiert: June 18, 2026Geprüft von: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Narrative reviewArzneimittelentwicklungLupi A et al. · Cardiovascular & hematological agents in medicinal chemistry, 2013

Abstract

The direct thrombin inhibitor bivalirudin has gained popularity in cardiovascular medicine over the past decade because, in comparison with unfractionated heparin, it guarantees a predictable dose-related degree of anticoagulation with a low immunogenic profile and, possibly, with reduced rates of major bleeding complications. In the past bivalirudin has been frequently employed in the management of patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. The REPLACE-2, ACUITY and ISAR-REACT4 studies demonstrated bivalirudin non-inferiority in comparison with unfractionated heparin in terms of ischemic end-points with a reduction of the bleeding rate also in patients acute coronary syndrome without ST elevation. Finally the results of the HORIZONS-AMI study positioned this drug as a first choice anticoagulant during percutaneous coronary interventions in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. In fact the bivalirudin alone regimen, compared to unfractionated heparin plus GP2b3a inhibitors, decreased in-hospital bleeding rates and short and long term mortality. Given the body of clinical evidence, bivalirudin is likely to contend to GP2b3a inhibitors the leading place among the proposed anticoagulation strategies in the setting of acute coronary syndromes. The duration of the bivalirudin infusion after PCI and the optimal oral antiplatelet regimen associated to bivalirudin are important issues to be solved in future randomized controlled studies.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal ArticleReview
Indexed MeSH termsAntithrombinsCardiovascular DiseasesChemotherapy, AdjuvantHirudinsHumansMyocardial InfarctionPeptide FragmentsRecombinant Proteins

Zusammenfassung

The direct thrombin inhibitor bivalirudin has gained popularity in cardiovascular medicine over the past decade because, in comparison with unfractionated heparin, it guarantees a predictable dose-related degree of anticoagulation with a low immunogenic profile and, possibly, with reduced rates of major bleeding complications.

Warum dies für die Hirudotherapie relevant ist

This review summarized the role of bivalirudin, described in the abstract as a direct thrombin inhibitor, as an anticoagulant during percutaneous coronary interventions, citing the REPLACE-2, ACUITY, ISAR-REACT 4, and HORIZONS-AMI studies. The abstract reports that bivalirudin demonstrated non-inferiority to unfractionated heparin on ischemic endpoints with reduced bleeding rates, and decreased in-hospital bleeding and short- and long-term mortality in ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Although bivalirudin is categorized under the MeSH term 'Hirudins,' the abstract itself does not mention leeches, hirudin, or hirudotherapy at any point. No defensible connection to applied hirudotherapy or the leech secretome can be drawn from this abstract alone.

Zitation

Pharmacological adjuvant therapies in primary coronary interventions: bivalirudin

Lupi A et al. · Cardiovascular & hematological agents in medicinal chemistry, 2013

Verwandter klinischer Kontext

Zur ASH-Bibliothek hinzugefügt: May 27, 2026 · Letzte Aktualisierung der Website: June 18, 2026

Diese Website stellt Bildungsinformationen bereit und ist weder eine medizinische Beratung noch eine Diagnose oder Behandlungsempfehlung. Die medizinische Blutegeltherapie ist mit klinisch relevanten Risiken verbunden und sollte ausschließlich von qualifizierten Klinikerinnen und Klinikern unter institutionell genehmigten Protokollen durchgeführt werden. Die FDA-510(k)-Zulassung für medizinische Blutegel ist auf bestimmte Indikationen beschränkt; experimentelle und Off-Label-Diskussionen werden entsprechend gekennzeichnet. Für patientenspezifische Beratung wenden Sie sich an eine qualifizierte Gesundheitsfachkraft.