Amerikanische Gesellschaft für Hirudotherapie

Acquisition of basic microsurgery skills using home-based simulation training

RCT published in J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg (2017)

Zuletzt aktualisiert: June 18, 2026Geprüft von: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Randomized controlled trialKlinische StudienMalik MM et al. · Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery, 2017

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Acquisition of fine motor skills required in microsurgery can be challenging in the current training system. Therefore, there is an increased demand for novel training and assessment methods to optimise learning outside the clinical setting. Here, we present a randomised control trial of three microsurgical training models, namely laboratory tabletop training microscope (Laboratory Microscope, LM), low-cost jewellers microscope (Home Microscope, HM) and iPad trainer (Home Tablet, HT). METHODS: Thirty-nine participants were allocated to four groups, control n = 9, LM n = 10, HM n = 10 and HT n = 10. The participants performed a chicken femoral artery anastomosis at baseline and at the completion of training. The performance was assessed as follows: structured assessment of microsurgery skills (SAMS) score, time taken to complete anastomosis and time for suture placement. RESULT: No statistically significant difference was noted between the groups at baseline. There was a statistically significant improvement in all training arms between the baseline and post-training for SAMS score, time taken to complete the anastomosis and time per suture placement. In addition, a reduction was observed in the leak rate. No statistical difference was observed among the training arms. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated that at the early stages of microsurgical skill acquisition, home training using either the jewellers microscope or iPad produces comparable results to laboratory-based training using a tabletop microscope. Therefore, home microsurgical training is a viable, easily accessible cost-effective modality that allows trainees to practice and take ownership of their technical skill development in this area.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal ArticleRandomized Controlled Trial
Indexed MeSH termsAnastomosis, SurgicalAnastomotic LeakAnimalsChickensClinical CompetenceComputers, HandheldFemoral ArteryHumansMicroscopyMicrosurgeryMotor SkillsOperative Time

Zusammenfassung

RCT of 39 participants showed home microsurgery training using low-cost jewellers microscope or iPad trainer produces comparable results to laboratory tabletop microscope on chicken femoral artery anastomosis.

Warum dies für die Hirudotherapie relevant ist

This randomized controlled trial evaluated three microsurgical training models—a laboratory tabletop microscope, a low-cost jeweler's microscope, and an iPad trainer—using 39 participants performing chicken femoral artery anastomoses assessed by SAMS scores, completion times, and leak rates. The results demonstrated that home-based training using affordable devices produced comparable outcomes to laboratory-based training in early skill acquisition, with statistically significant improvements across all training arms. This article has no direct relevance to hirudotherapy, the leech secretome, or the American Society of Hirudotherapy's domain—it focuses strictly on surgical training equipment and contains no mention of leeches, leech-derived compounds, or hirudotherapy techniques.

Zitation

Acquisition of basic microsurgery skills using home-based simulation training: A randomised control study.

Malik MM et al. · Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery, 2017

Verwandter klinischer Kontext

Erfahren Sie, wie diese Forschung mit der klinischen Praxis verknüpft ist

Zur ASH-Bibliothek hinzugefügt: May 27, 2026 · Letzte Aktualisierung der Website: June 18, 2026

Diese Website stellt Bildungsinformationen bereit und ist weder eine medizinische Beratung noch eine Diagnose oder Behandlungsempfehlung. Die medizinische Blutegeltherapie ist mit klinisch relevanten Risiken verbunden und sollte ausschließlich von qualifizierten Klinikerinnen und Klinikern unter institutionell genehmigten Protokollen durchgeführt werden. Die FDA-510(k)-Zulassung für medizinische Blutegel ist auf bestimmte Indikationen beschränkt; experimentelle und Off-Label-Diskussionen werden entsprechend gekennzeichnet. Für patientenspezifische Beratung wenden Sie sich an eine qualifizierte Gesundheitsfachkraft.