Amerikanische Gesellschaft für Hirudotherapie

Management of Upper Airway Leech Infestations

Research article published in Ear nose & throat journal (2019)

Zuletzt aktualisiert: June 18, 2026Geprüft von: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Research reportArzneimittelentwicklungHarun K et al. · Ear nose & throat journal, 2019

Abstract

PURPOSE: Upper airway foreign body is one of the most encountered clinical situations in otolaryngology practice. In rare conditions, a living organism may be a foreign body in the upper airway. In this study, we demonstrate 19 patients with leech infestations in nose, nasopharynx, and larynx. METHODS: This study was enrolled with 19 patients between 2012 and 2016 in a regional state hospital. All of the patients were admitted to clinic with these complaints: epistaxis, hemoptysis, coughing, foreign body sensation, and bloody stool. RESULTS: There were 12 male and 7 female patients. The leech was in the nose in 12 patients, in nasopharynx in 6 patients, and in the larynx in only 1 patient. All leeches are removed under local anesthesia (except laryngeal presentation). No bleeding and complication were seen after extraction of leech. CONCLUSION: Leech can be easily diagnosed and managed in the upper aero-digestive tract without any complication and leech-associated disease.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal Article
Indexed MeSH termsAdolescentAdultAirway ObstructionAnimalsChildChild, PreschoolFemaleForeign BodiesHumansLarynxLeechesMale

Zusammenfassung

Management of Upper Airway Leech Infestations.

Warum dies für die Hirudotherapie relevant ist

This study reports 19 patients (12 male, 7 female) treated between 2012 and 2016 for leech infestations in the nose (12), nasopharynx (6), or larynx (1), presenting with epistaxis, hemoptysis, cough, foreign body sensation, or bloody stool. All leeches were removed under local anesthesia (except the laryngeal case), with no post-extraction bleeding or complications. For ASH's domain, this article relates to leeches as accidental parasitic foreign bodies rather than therapeutic hirudotherapy; it documents clinical presentation and safe removal technique. CAVEAT: This concerns unintentional leech infestation, not medicinal leech application or the leech secretome, so its relevance to therapeutic hirudotherapy is limited to safety and clinical management context.

Zitation

Management of Upper Airway Leech Infestations

Harun K et al. · Ear nose & throat journal, 2019

DOI

Verwandter klinischer Kontext

Erfahren Sie, wie diese Forschung mit der klinischen Praxis verknüpft ist

Drug PipelineDrug DevelopmentDirect Thrombin InhibitorsHirudinAnticoagulation CompoundsHemostasisOtolaryngology

Zur ASH-Bibliothek hinzugefügt: May 27, 2026 · Letzte Aktualisierung der Website: June 18, 2026

Diese Website stellt Bildungsinformationen bereit und ist weder eine medizinische Beratung noch eine Diagnose oder Behandlungsempfehlung. Die medizinische Blutegeltherapie ist mit klinisch relevanten Risiken verbunden und sollte ausschließlich von qualifizierten Klinikerinnen und Klinikern unter institutionell genehmigten Protokollen durchgeführt werden. Die FDA-510(k)-Zulassung für medizinische Blutegel ist auf bestimmte Indikationen beschränkt; experimentelle und Off-Label-Diskussionen werden entsprechend gekennzeichnet. Für patientenspezifische Beratung wenden Sie sich an eine qualifizierte Gesundheitsfachkraft.