Amerikanische Gesellschaft für Hirudotherapie

Intraoperative Bivalirudin Use in Patient Undergoing Femoral Endarterectomy with Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia: Case Report and Review of the Literature

Case report published in Vasc Endovascular Surg (2023)

Zuletzt aktualisiert: June 18, 2026Geprüft von: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Case reportArzneimittelentwicklungKlinische StudienHaffler ZJ et al. · Vasc Endovascular Surg, 2023

Abstract

PURPOSE: To describe the intraoperative use of bivalirudin during lower extremity revascularization in the setting of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). CASE SUMMARY: A 65 year-old man presented with left common iliac, external iliac, and femoral artery occlusion necessitating revascularization with left femoral endarterectomy and common and external iliac stent angioplasty. Three months before the femoral endarterectomy, the patient was hospitalized for a coronary artery bypass procedure. During this admission, the patient tested positive for the presence of heparin-PF4 antibody complexes. With the patient's recent history of HIT, bivalirudin was selected as the optimal agent for intraoperative anticoagulation. Bivalirudin was administered as a 50 mg bolus, followed by a continuous infusion initiated at 1.75 mg/kg/hr. Repeated bivalirudin boluses were necessary to maintain an activated clotting time (ACT) necessary for the revascularization procedures and recurrent subacute thrombi despite appropriate ACT values. DISCUSSION: Bivalirudin has been utilized for cardiopulmonary bypass and carotid endarterectomy (CEA), but data for dosing in lower extremity revascularization are lacking. As the risk for thrombosis with HIT continues for months after diagnosis, it is important to elucidate optimal dosing of non-heparin anticoagulant options, such as the direct thrombin inhibitor, bivalirudin. The absence of validated dosing strategies for bivalirudin can result in prolonged operative times, increased risk of bleeding, and inadequate anticoagulation. CONCLUSION: Bivalirudin is an appropriate agent for intraoperative anticoagulation in lower extremity revascularization. However, further investigation into the optimal intraoperative bivalirudin dosing regimen is necessary.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeReviewCase ReportsJournal Article
Indexed MeSH termsAgedHumansMaleAnticoagulantsEndarterectomy, CarotidHeparinHirudinsPeptide FragmentsRecombinant ProteinsThrombocytopeniaTreatment Outcome

Zusammenfassung

To describe the intraoperative use of bivalirudin during lower extremity revascularization in the setting of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT).

Warum dies für die Hirudotherapie relevant ist

This case report describes the intraoperative use of bivalirudin — a direct thrombin inhibitor — for anticoagulation during femoral endarterectomy and common and external iliac stent angioplasty in a 65-year-old man with a recent history of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Bivalirudin was administered as a 50 mg bolus followed by a 1.75 mg/kg/h infusion, with repeated boluses required to maintain adequate activated clotting time, and the authors note that validated dosing data for lower extremity revascularization are lacking. The abstract does not mention leeches, hirudin, or hirudotherapy, and provides no basis for connecting bivalirudin to the leech secretome or to a leech-derived compound. Caveat: This is a single case report of a pharmaceutical anticoagulant; based on the abstract, it has no direct relevance to hirudotherapy or to ASH's domain.

Zitation

Intraoperative Bivalirudin Use in Patient Undergoing Femoral Endarterectomy with Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia: Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Haffler ZJ et al. · Vasc Endovascular Surg, 2023

Verwandter klinischer Kontext

Zur ASH-Bibliothek hinzugefügt: May 27, 2026 · Letzte Aktualisierung der Website: June 18, 2026

Diese Website stellt Bildungsinformationen bereit und ist weder eine medizinische Beratung noch eine Diagnose oder Behandlungsempfehlung. Die medizinische Blutegeltherapie ist mit klinisch relevanten Risiken verbunden und sollte ausschließlich von qualifizierten Klinikerinnen und Klinikern unter institutionell genehmigten Protokollen durchgeführt werden. Die FDA-510(k)-Zulassung für medizinische Blutegel ist auf bestimmte Indikationen beschränkt; experimentelle und Off-Label-Diskussionen werden entsprechend gekennzeichnet. Für patientenspezifische Beratung wenden Sie sich an eine qualifizierte Gesundheitsfachkraft.