From salves to Sulzberger: the emergence of the American approach to acne treatment

Acne vulgaris is the most prevalent chronic skin disorder in the United States, affecting approximately 50 million individuals annually. Despite the availability of effective modern therapies, the evolution of acne treatment remains a rich and understudied topic in dermatologic history. This review traces the historic progression of acne management in the United States, highlighting key therapeutic milestones, shifts in clinical practice, and evolving societal perceptions of the disease. Early approaches to acne worldwide, rooted in humoral theory, included arsenicals, bloodletting, sulfur preparations, and folk remedies. The late 19th and early 20th centuries saw a gradual move toward rational therapies, including dietary regulation, topical antiseptics, and even vaccine and x-ray treatments. By the mid-20th century, dermatology entered a scientific era led by figures such as Dr Marion B. Sulzberger, ushering in antibiotic therapy, keratolytics, and eventually isotretinoin, representing the first treatment to target all major pathogenic factors. This period also marked a cultural shift: acne was no longer seen as a trivial esthetic issue but a condition with significant psychologic implications. The history of acne therapy in the United States illustrates a transition from empiric and often harmful interventions toward evidence-based, patient-centered care. Although treatments have advanced significantly, enduring challenges remain, particularly in addressing the psychologic burden of the disease. Continued innovation, both pharmacologic and psychosocial, is essential to meet the complex needs of acne patients today.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Historical review of American acne-treatment evolution including bloodletting/leech historical context.

Erfahren Sie, wie diese Forschung mit der klinischen Praxis verknüpft ist

More peer-reviewed studies in Klinische Studien.

• Leech Therapy for Knee Osteoarthritis — The Landmark RCT — Michalsen et al. (2003)
• Leech-Assisted Flap Salvage — Systematic Review of 277 Cases — Whitaker et al. (2012)
• Effects of hirudotherapy on liver functions, lipid profile, and insulin sensitivity in rats with metabolic syndrome — Bilden A et al. (2026)
• Efficacy and Safety of Hirudotherapy for Improving Sperm Quality Parameters in Male Infertility: A Randomized Controlled Trial — Abtahi-Forooshani M et al. (2026)
• Reverse Sural Flap Venous Congestion Successfully Managed With Enoxaparin in a Male Patient With a Traumatic Foot Crush Injury: A Case Report — Velasco-Bustamante J et al. (2026)
• Investigation of the therapeutic effects of medicinal leech treatment on lower extremity ischemia-reperfusion injury — Ünal K et al. (2026)
• Efficacy of Medicinal Leech Therapy in Diverse Clinical Applications: A Comprehensive Study from Azerbaijan — Farzali S et al. (2025)
• HIRUDOTHERAPY IN RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY: CASE-REPORTS AND REVIEW — Heinz P et al. (2020)
• Hirudotherapy Efficacy and Complications in the Management of Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review — Foppiani J et al. (2024)
• Hirudotherapy in Wound Healing — Nair H et al. (2022)

Browse all ASH-analysed research →