Re-infarction after primary percutaneous coronary intervention
Review published in Current opinion in cardiology (2015)
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Thrombus formation, usually on a ruptured atherosclerotic plaque, is pivotal in the pathogenesis of ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). This thrombus formation provides the milieu for re-occlusion of the infarct-related artery, the main location of re-infarction post-STEMI. Although rates of re-infarction are lower after reperfusion by primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) than after fibrinolytic therapy, re-infarction remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality. RECENT FINDINGS: The predominant cause of re-infarction after primary PCI is stent thrombosis. Two recent trials [A Prospective, Randomized Trial of Ambulance Initiation of Bivalirudin vs. Heparin ± Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors in Patients with STEMI Undergoing Primary PCI (EUROMAX) and Unfractionated heparin versus bivalirudin in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (HEAT-PPCI)] have each reported higher rates of stent thrombosis in the first 24 h after primary PCI in patients assigned to receive bivalirudin, which affects the balance of risks and benefit of bivalirudin post-STEMI. Also, in a subanalysis of the Platelet Inhibition And Patient Outcomes trial, ticagrelor reduces re-infarction compared with clopidogrel in patients with STEMI after primary PCI. Other nonpharmacological or mechanical interventions during primary PCI, with the exception of newer-generation drug-eluting stents in the Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry, have not affected rates of re-infarction. SUMMARY: Re-infarction remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Re-infarction rates are altered by pharmacological strategy and stent selection in primary PCI. The design of future trials to detect possible treatment differences in relatively low event rates will provide challenges, and may require more novel strategies such as administrative data collection for patient characteristics and key outcomes.
Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.
Zusammenfassung
Thrombus formation, usually on a ruptured atherosclerotic plaque, is pivotal in the pathogenesis of ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).
Warum dies für die Hirudotherapie relevant ist
Dieser Review untersucht die Ursachen der Reinfarktbildung nach primärer perkutaner Koronarintervention, identifiziert die Stentthrombose als vorherrschende Ursache und erörtert, wie pharmakologische Strategie und Stentauswahl die Reinfarktraten verändern. Er verweist auf zwei Studien (EUROMAX und HEAT-PPCI), die höhere frühe Stentthromboseraten unter Bivalirudin berichten, sowie auf eine Subanalyse, in der Ticagrelor die Reinfarktrate im Vergleich zu Clopidogrel reduzierte. Das Abstract erwähnt Bivalirudin, enthält jedoch keinen Verweis auf Hirudin, Blutegel, Egelspeichel oder eine andere Komponente des Blutegelsekretoms. Folglich lässt sich aus diesem Abstract allein keine tragfähige Verbindung zur Hirudotherapie oder zum Zuständigkeitsbereich der ASH herstellen; eine derartige Verknüpfung würde externes pharmakologisches Wissen erfordern, das in der Quelle nicht vorhanden ist.
Zitation
Re-infarction after primary percutaneous coronary intervention
French JK et al. · Current opinion in cardiology, 2015
Verwandter klinischer Kontext
Erfahren Sie, wie diese Forschung mit der klinischen Praxis verknüpft ist
Zur ASH-Bibliothek hinzugefügt: May 27, 2026 · Letzte Aktualisierung der Website: 18. Juni 2026