Amerikanische Gesellschaft für Hirudotherapie

Evaluation of bivalirudin-based anticoagulation for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, including patients with COVID-19

Clinical research published in J Extra Corpor Technol (2026)

Zuletzt aktualisiert: June 18, 2026Geprüft von: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Research reportArzneimittelentwicklungSicherheit & InfektionskontrolleKlinische StudienRaguindin M et al. · The journal of extra-corporeal technology, 2026

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although unfractionated heparin (UFH) has traditionally been used for anticoagulation during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), bivalirudin may be preferred due to fewer complications. A prior medication use evaluation of ECMO patients who received bivalirudin resulted in dosing updates for our pharmacist-directed bivalirudin protocol. This study intended to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bivalirudin for anticoagulation during ECMO support post-protocol initiation. METHODS: This was a retrospective, single-center, pre-post study. Adult patients requiring ECMO support for at least 24 h and who received bivalirudin between January 1, 2015 to July 31, 2018 (pre-group) and May 1, 2019 to June 30, 2021 (post-group) were included. RESULTS: There were 38 patients in the pre- and 35 patients in the post-group. The primary outcome, median time to two consecutive activated partial thromboplastin times (aPTTs) within therapeutic range for the initial goal range, was 8.9 h in the pre- and 14.2 h in the post-group (p = 0.517). In a subgroup analysis of the post-group, the primary outcome was higher in patients with COVID-19 (26.5 vs. 8.6 h, p = 0.018). The median number of dose adjustments to achieve goal aPTT was higher in COVID-19 patients (4 vs. 2, p = 0.017). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that a standardized pharmacist-directed protocol for bivalirudin in ECMO achieves timely therapeutic anticoagulation levels. Patients with COVID-19 trended toward longer times to two consecutive therapeutic aPTTs. Further studies are needed to evaluate dosing strategies in patients with and without COVID-19.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal Article
Indexed MeSH termsHumansHirudinsExtracorporeal Membrane OxygenationPeptide FragmentsRetrospective StudiesMaleFemaleRecombinant ProteinsMiddle AgedCOVID-19AdultAnticoagulants

Zusammenfassung

Evaluation of bivalirudin-based anticoagulation during ECMO support across patient cohorts including those with COVID-19, comparing bleeding/thrombosis outcomes against heparin-based protocols.

Warum dies für die Hirudotherapie relevant ist

This retrospective, single-center, pre-post study evaluated a pharmacist-directed bivalirudin dosing protocol for ECMO anticoagulation across 73 patients (38 pre-protocol, 35 post-protocol), reporting that the standardized protocol achieved timely therapeutic aPTT levels, while a COVID-19 subgroup showed longer times to two consecutive therapeutic aPTTs (26.5 vs. 8.6 h, P=0.018) and more dose adjustments. The abstract does not mention hirudin, leeches, or leech therapy, and bivalirudin is discussed solely as an alternative to heparin without any reference to leech-derived compounds. No defensible connection to hirudotherapy or the leech secretome can be drawn from this article. The study is therefore not relevant to ASH's domain.

Zitation

Evaluation of bivalirudin-based anticoagulation for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, including patients with COVID-19.

Raguindin M et al. · The journal of extra-corporeal technology, 2026

Verwandter klinischer Kontext

Zur ASH-Bibliothek hinzugefügt: May 27, 2026 · Letzte Aktualisierung der Website: June 18, 2026

Diese Website stellt Bildungsinformationen bereit und ist weder eine medizinische Beratung noch eine Diagnose oder Behandlungsempfehlung. Die medizinische Blutegeltherapie ist mit klinisch relevanten Risiken verbunden und sollte ausschließlich von qualifizierten Klinikerinnen und Klinikern unter institutionell genehmigten Protokollen durchgeführt werden. Die FDA-510(k)-Zulassung für medizinische Blutegel ist auf bestimmte Indikationen beschränkt; experimentelle und Off-Label-Diskussionen werden entsprechend gekennzeichnet. Für patientenspezifische Beratung wenden Sie sich an eine qualifizierte Gesundheitsfachkraft.