Amerikanische Gesellschaft für Hirudotherapie

Foot and ankle biomaterials: a comprehensive review of current applications, challenges, and future directions

Review published in J Orthop Translat (2026)

Zuletzt aktualisiert: June 18, 2026Geprüft von: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Narrative reviewKlinische StudienSicherheit & InfektionskontrolleElvin P et al. · J Orthop Translat, 2026

Abstract

Metallic biomaterials enable successful reconstruction and fixation of skeletal tissues by supporting repair, load-bearing function, and anatomical alignment in foot and ankle surgery. However, the unique anatomic and biomechanical demands of this region, combined with challenging pathologies such as flatfoot and Charcot neuroarthropathy, present distinct challenges, with effective intervention requiring targeted biomaterial solutions and precise indications. Furthermore, metallic biomaterials currently represent the most predominant and clinically validated fixation systems in foot and ankle surgical reconstructions, while also generating the largest body of outcome-based evidence. This review summarizes and discusses their contemporary applications, outcomes, limitations, unmeet needs, and future directions based on clinical literature between 2020 and 2024. Emerging innovations, including 3D-printed titanium implants for patient-specific reconstructions, surface-engineered alloys designed to improve osseointegration, with infection mitigation properties for at risk patient populations, and the exploration of bioresorbable/biointegrative magnesium, as well as non-metallic alternative materials (e.g. polymerics) were examined. Persistent unmet needs identified in the literature include hardware challenges in osteoporotic bone and neuropathic patients, ion leeching, cyclic fatigue, economic burden, imaging artifact interference, and lack of long-term data or clinical trials on innovative implant designs and manufacturing approaches. Lastly, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) imaging of titanium, nitinol, and stainless steel is provided to offer an analysis on biomaterial-specific microstructural features, such as surface roughness and porosity, that play a role in influencing tissue integration, corrosion behavior, and mechanical performance in reconstructive surgeries. The Translational Potential of this Article: This review provides clinically actionable guidance for selecting metallic biomaterials tailored to the biomechanical and pathological demands of foot and ankle surgery, supporting evidence-based decisions of selection of hardwares, improved fixation strategies, and reduced complication rates. It also adds recent insights to inform the development and optimization of next-generation devices based on patient- and site-specific requirements, such as 3D-printed constructs and surface-engineered implants, designed to enhance fusion, reconstruction, and limb salvage outcomes.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal ArticleReview

Zusammenfassung

Metallic biomaterials enable successful reconstruction and fixation of skeletal tissues by supporting repair, load-bearing function, and anatomical alignment in foot and ankle surgery.

Warum dies für die Hirudotherapie relevant ist

This comprehensive review evaluates the current applications, limitations, and future directions of metallic biomaterials used in foot and ankle reconstructive surgery. The authors discuss the clinical outcomes of various implants and highlight persistent challenges, including cyclic fatigue, economic burden, and "ion leeching" from medical hardware. While this review addresses important complications and innovations in orthopedic surgery, it has absolutely no relevance to the American Society of Hirudotherapy. The term "leeching" in this context refers strictly to the chemical release of metal ions from surgical implants into the body, not the biological leeches or their therapeutic secretomes.

Zitation

Foot and ankle biomaterials: a comprehensive review of current applications, challenges, and future directions.

Elvin P et al. · J Orthop Translat, 2026

Verwandter klinischer Kontext

Zur ASH-Bibliothek hinzugefügt: May 27, 2026 · Letzte Aktualisierung der Website: June 18, 2026

Diese Website stellt Bildungsinformationen bereit und ist weder eine medizinische Beratung noch eine Diagnose oder Behandlungsempfehlung. Die medizinische Blutegeltherapie ist mit klinisch relevanten Risiken verbunden und sollte ausschließlich von qualifizierten Klinikerinnen und Klinikern unter institutionell genehmigten Protokollen durchgeführt werden. Die FDA-510(k)-Zulassung für medizinische Blutegel ist auf bestimmte Indikationen beschränkt; experimentelle und Off-Label-Diskussionen werden entsprechend gekennzeichnet. Für patientenspezifische Beratung wenden Sie sich an eine qualifizierte Gesundheitsfachkraft.