Amerikanische Gesellschaft für Hirudotherapie

Bivalirudin for patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia undergoing cardiovascular surgery

Systematic review published in Annals of Pharmacotherapy (2008)

Zuletzt aktualisiert: June 18, 2026Geprüft von: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Narrative reviewKlinische StudienArzneimittelentwicklungCzosnowski QA et al. · Annals of Pharmacotherapy, 2008

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of bivalirudin in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) undergoing cardiovascular surgery. DATA SOURCES: Relevant information was identified through a search of MEDLINE (1966-April 2008), International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1960-April 2008), and Cochrane Databases (publications archived until April 2008) using the terms bivalirudin, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, and cardiovascular surgery. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Prospective and retrospective studies, case reports, and case series in adults were eligible for inclusion if bivalirudin had been used in a patient with known HIT undergoing any cardiovascular surgical procedure other than percutaneous coronary intervention. DATA SYNTHESIS: Two small, open-label, multicenter clinical trials were identified that evaluated treatment with bivalirudin in patients with HIT undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery. One looked at on-pump cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), while the other looked at off-pump CPB. Procedural success was achieved at day 7 in 94% (n = 46) of patients in the on-pump CPB study and in 92% (n = 47) of patients in the off-pump CPB study. Dosing strategies varied between the 2 trials, with the on-pump study using a 1-mg/kg bivalirudin bolus followed by a 2.5-mg/kg/h infusion; the off-pump study used a 0.75-mg/kg bolus followed by a 1.75-mg/kg/h infusion. In addition, 10 case reports met the criteria to be included in the review and are summarized. In these cases, procedural success was reported using various bivalirudin doses in valve repair and replacement, right ventricular assist device implantation, and heart transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: Growing data demonstrate procedural success with bivalirudin in patients with HIT undergoing cardiovascular surgery. However, bivalirudin dosing and goal-activated clotting times varied between the studies and case reports. Bivalirudin represents a viable alternative to heparin in patients with HIT undergoing cardiovascular surgery; however, further trials are warranted to identify optimal dosing and monitoring parameters.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal ArticleReview
Indexed MeSH termsCardiovascular Surgical ProceduresHeparinHirudinsHumansPeptide FragmentsRecombinant ProteinsThrombocytopenia

Zusammenfassung

Literature review on bivalirudin during cardiovascular surgery in HIT; two open-label multicenter trials reported procedural success of 92–94% in on- and off-pump CABG, with diverse case-report dosing strategies.

Warum dies für die Hirudotherapie relevant ist

This review evaluates the use of bivalirudin in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) undergoing cardiovascular surgery, identifying two small open-label multicenter trials (on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery) plus 10 case reports spanning valve repair/replacement, right ventricular assist device implantation, and heart transplantation. Procedural success at day 7 was 94% in the on-pump trial and 92% in the off-pump trial; however, dosing strategies and goal activated clotting times varied between studies and case reports. The abstract concludes bivalirudin is a viable alternative to heparin in HIT patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery, with further trials warranted to identify optimal dosing and monitoring. The abstract does not mention hirudin, leeches, or leech therapy, and no connection to hirudotherapy is established.

Zitation

Bivalirudin for patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia undergoing cardiovascular surgery.

Czosnowski QA et al. · Annals of Pharmacotherapy, 2008

Verwandter klinischer Kontext

Zur ASH-Bibliothek hinzugefügt: May 27, 2026 · Letzte Aktualisierung der Website: June 18, 2026

Diese Website stellt Bildungsinformationen bereit und ist weder eine medizinische Beratung noch eine Diagnose oder Behandlungsempfehlung. Die medizinische Blutegeltherapie ist mit klinisch relevanten Risiken verbunden und sollte ausschließlich von qualifizierten Klinikerinnen und Klinikern unter institutionell genehmigten Protokollen durchgeführt werden. Die FDA-510(k)-Zulassung für medizinische Blutegel ist auf bestimmte Indikationen beschränkt; experimentelle und Off-Label-Diskussionen werden entsprechend gekennzeichnet. Für patientenspezifische Beratung wenden Sie sich an eine qualifizierte Gesundheitsfachkraft.