Amerikanische Gesellschaft für Hirudotherapie

Postoperative Digit and Hand Replantation Protocols: A Review of the Literature

Research article published in J Am Acad Orthop Surg (2021)

Zuletzt aktualisiert: June 18, 2026Geprüft von: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Research reportKlinische StudienSicherheit & InfektionskontrolleChen C et al. · J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 2021

Abstract

Successful replantation and revascularization of the hand and digit require a skilled team with urgent access to an operating room with microsurgical capabilities. Although careful indications and surgical techniques contribute to success, postoperative management also plays a vital role in the survival of a replanted digit. Previous research has assessed surgical efficiency and techniques to conduct these procedures, but few studies evaluate postoperative protocols to care for patients undergoing these procedures. Because of the lack of high-level evidence specific to replantation, many common postoperative practices related to monitoring, anticoagulation, and diet have been inferred from elective microsurgical procedures, despite notable differences in operating conditions. The highest level of evidence pertaining to digital replantation was found with the use of peripheral nerve blockade, leeching/bleeding, and nicotine use. This review provides an in-depth evaluation of the literature and insight into the rationale and level of evidence that support each postoperative intervention. It highlights institutional variability and a paucity of high-level evidence pertaining to this topic while identifying the areas of future research.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal Article
Indexed MeSH termsAmputation, TraumaticFinger InjuriesFingersHandHumansReplantationReview Literature as TopicVascular Surgical Procedures

Zusammenfassung

Review of postoperative protocols for digit and hand replantation; highest level of evidence pertains to peripheral nerve blockade, leeching/bleeding, and nicotine use.

Warum dies für die Hirudotherapie relevant ist

This review of the literature evaluated postoperative management protocols for hand and digit replantation, covering monitoring, anticoagulation, diet, peripheral nerve blockade, leeching/bleeding, and nicotine use. The authors identified peripheral nerve blockade, leeching/bleeding, and nicotine use as areas with the highest level of evidence in digital replantation postoperative care. The review is relevant to ASH's domain because it directly addresses leeching/bleeding as a postoperative intervention in replantation surgery, providing a connection to hirudotherapy practice. The caveat is that the abstract provides no specific quantitative outcome data for leeching, highlights institutional variability and a paucity of high-level evidence overall, and the exact nature and role of leech therapy is not described in detail.

Zitation

Postoperative Digit and Hand Replantation Protocols: A Review of the Literature.

Chen C et al. · J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 2021

Verwandter klinischer Kontext

Erfahren Sie, wie diese Forschung mit der klinischen Praxis verknüpft ist

Zur ASH-Bibliothek hinzugefügt: May 27, 2026 · Letzte Aktualisierung der Website: June 18, 2026

Diese Website stellt Bildungsinformationen bereit und ist weder eine medizinische Beratung noch eine Diagnose oder Behandlungsempfehlung. Die medizinische Blutegeltherapie ist mit klinisch relevanten Risiken verbunden und sollte ausschließlich von qualifizierten Klinikerinnen und Klinikern unter institutionell genehmigten Protokollen durchgeführt werden. Die FDA-510(k)-Zulassung für medizinische Blutegel ist auf bestimmte Indikationen beschränkt; experimentelle und Off-Label-Diskussionen werden entsprechend gekennzeichnet. Für patientenspezifische Beratung wenden Sie sich an eine qualifizierte Gesundheitsfachkraft.