Amerikanische Gesellschaft für Hirudotherapie

Chemical and mechanical alternatives to leech therapy: a systematic review and critical appraisal

Meta-analysis published in Journal of reconstructive microsurgery (2011)

Zuletzt aktualisiert: June 18, 2026Geprüft von: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Klinische StudienSicherheit & InfektionskontrolleArzneimittelentwicklungAzzopardi E et al. · Journal of reconstructive microsurgery, 2011

Abstract

Although leech therapy is a well-established, effective method of relieving venous congestion, it is associated with complications such as wound infection and leech migration. To minimize these risks, efforts to reproduce their effects have been developed and investigated. A search string using (chemical OR mechanical OR alternative) AND (Leeches OR HIRUDO MEDICINALIS) in Boolean format was used across the major electronic databases to cover the past 10 years. Selected references were subsequently validated against critical appraisal frameworks and classified and evaluated against a framework of hierarchies of evidence. Out of 95 retrieved studies, 25 articles were selected after content appraisal. Of these, 12 articles were methodologically and statistically robust. The heterogeneity noted in the studies precluded meta-analysis of the results. The studies infer evidence at Grade B level that current device prototypes show proof of concept by providing suction and chemical anticoagulation following a surgically created wound. Although progress had been made to replicate leech action, there are still areas to address in future research. This article represents the current state of play in clinical translation of these concepts, providing efficacious devices without the drawbacks of traditional leech therapy.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal ArticleSystematic Review
Indexed MeSH termsAnimalsAnticoagulantsHumansLeechesLeechingPostoperative ComplicationsReplantationSuctionVenous Insufficiency

Zusammenfassung

Although leech therapy is a well-established, effective method of relieving venous congestion, it is associated with complications such as wound infection and leech migration.

Warum dies für die Hirudotherapie relevant ist

Provides high-level synthesized evidence. Contributes clinical evidence for the therapeutic application of leech therapy.

Zitation

Chemical and mechanical alternatives to leech therapy: a systematic review and critical appraisal.

Azzopardi E et al. · Journal of reconstructive microsurgery, 2011

Verwandter klinischer Kontext

Zur ASH-Bibliothek hinzugefügt: March 18, 2026 · Letzte Aktualisierung der Website: June 18, 2026

Diese Website stellt Bildungsinformationen bereit und ist weder eine medizinische Beratung noch eine Diagnose oder Behandlungsempfehlung. Die medizinische Blutegeltherapie ist mit klinisch relevanten Risiken verbunden und sollte ausschließlich von qualifizierten Klinikerinnen und Klinikern unter institutionell genehmigten Protokollen durchgeführt werden. Die FDA-510(k)-Zulassung für medizinische Blutegel ist auf bestimmte Indikationen beschränkt; experimentelle und Off-Label-Diskussionen werden entsprechend gekennzeichnet. Für patientenspezifische Beratung wenden Sie sich an eine qualifizierte Gesundheitsfachkraft.