Американское общество гирудотерапии

Treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis.

Review published in Blood (2013)

Последнее обновление: June 18, 2026Рецензент: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Narrative reviewКлинические исследованияРазработка лекарственных препаратовLee et al. · Blood, 2013

Abstract

Therapeutic options for the management of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with cancer remain very limited. Although low-molecular-weight heparin monotherapy has been identified as a simple and efficacious regimen compared with an initial parenteral anticoagulant followed by long-term therapy with a vitamin K antagonist, many clinical questions remain unanswered. These include optimal duration of anticoagulant therapy, treatment of recurrent VTE, and the treatment of patients with concurrent bleeding or those with a high risk of bleeding. Treatment recommendations from consensus clinical guidelines are largely based on retrospective reports or extrapolated data from the noncancer population with VTE, as randomized controlled trials focused on cancer-associated thrombosis are sorely lacking. Furthermore, with improvements in imaging technology and extended survival duration of patients with cancer, we are encountering more unique challenges, such as the management of incidental VTE. Clinicians should be aware of the limitations of the novel oral anticoagulants and avoid the use of these agents because of the paucity of evidence in the treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal ArticleReview
Indexed MeSH termsAnticoagulantsHumansNeoplasmsPractice Guidelines as TopicVenous Thrombosis

Резюме

Therapeutic options for the management of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with cancer remain very limited. Although low-molecular-weight heparin monotherapy has been identified as a simple and efficacious regimen compared with an initial parenteral anticoagulant followed by long-term...

Почему это важно для гирудотерапии

This review article addresses the management of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism, noting that low-molecular-weight heparin monotherapy remains the mainstay compared with parenteral anticoagulation followed by vitamin K antagonists, while many clinical questions—optimal duration, recurrent VTE treatment, management of patients with bleeding risk—remain unanswered due to a scarcity of randomized controlled trials in cancer populations. The authors caution against use of novel oral anticoagulants in this setting given insufficient evidence. For ASH's domain, this article addresses antithrombotic pharmacotherapy broadly but contains no reference to leeches, hirudotherapy, or the leech secretome; any relevance is limited to the general landscape of anticoagulation management without a specific connection to leech-derived therapeutics.

Цитирование

Treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis.

Lee et al. · Blood, 2013

Связанный клинический контекст

Узнайте, как это исследование связано с клинической практикой

Добавлено в библиотеку ASH: May 28, 2026 · Последнее обновление сайта: June 18, 2026

Этот сайт предоставляет образовательную информацию и не является медицинской консультацией, диагнозом или рекомендацией по лечению. Гирудотерапия сопряжена с клинически значимыми рисками и должна проводиться только квалифицированными клиницистами в рамках институционально утверждённых протоколов. Разрешение FDA 510(k) для медицинских пиявок ограничено определёнными показаниями; обсуждения исследовательского и нелицензионного применения отмечены соответствующим образом. Для индивидуальных медицинских рекомендаций обратитесь к квалифицированному медицинскому специалисту.