Американское общество гирудотерапии

Modern postoperative monitoring of free flaps.

Review published in Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery (2018)

Последнее обновление: June 18, 2026Рецензент: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Narrative reviewКлинические исследованияKääriäinen et al. · Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery, 2018

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Flap failure in microvascular reconstruction is a costly complication with total flap loss being the worst-case scenario. With the aim to rapidly identify a postoperative circulatory problem, some susceptible flaps can be saved by careful clinical monitoring or by various technical monitoring methods. In head and neck surgery, where the flaps are often buried and difficult to monitor clinically, a reliable technical monitoring method would be useful. A broad range of different techniques are in use varying according to practical and personal preferences among clinics and surgeons. However, no evidence for any particular technique being superb has emerged. We review reports of some frequently used and modern free flap monitoring techniques. RECENT FINDINGS: Clinical monitoring is still the gold standard to which other techniques are compared to. Laser Doppler flowmetry and near-infrared spectroscopy have been reported to identify early circulatory problems, but both techniques are not well suited for buried flaps. Implantable Doppler, flow coupler, partial tissue oxygen pressure and microdialysis are invasive monitoring methods suitable for buried flaps. SUMMARY: More research with practical and clinically relevant parameters, that is flap salvage rate, false positive rate and cost-efficiency are needed before objective comparisons between different monitoring techniques can be made.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal ArticleReview
Indexed MeSH termsFree Tissue FlapsHumansLaser-Doppler FlowmetryMicrodialysisOxygenSpectroscopy, Near-InfraredUltrasonography, Doppler, Color

Резюме

Flap failure in microvascular reconstruction is a costly complication with total flap loss being the worst-case scenario. With the aim to rapidly identify a postoperative circulatory problem, some susceptible flaps can be saved by careful clinical monitoring or by various technical monitoring methods.

Почему это важно для гирудотерапии

This review examined frequently used and modern postoperative monitoring techniques for free flaps, including laser Doppler flowmetry, near-infrared spectroscopy, implantable Doppler, flow coupler, partial tissue oxygen pressure, and microdialysis. It concluded that clinical monitoring remains the gold standard and that more research on flap salvage rate, false positive rate, and cost-efficiency is needed before objective comparisons between techniques can be made. The abstract makes no mention of leeches, hirudotherapy, venous congestion, or any leech-derived substances. There is no defensible leech or hirudotherapy connection in this abstract.

Цитирование

Modern postoperative monitoring of free flaps.

Kääriäinen et al. · Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery, 2018

Связанный клинический контекст

Узнайте, как это исследование связано с клинической практикой

Добавлено в библиотеку ASH: May 28, 2026 · Последнее обновление сайта: June 18, 2026

Этот сайт предоставляет образовательную информацию и не является медицинской консультацией, диагнозом или рекомендацией по лечению. Гирудотерапия сопряжена с клинически значимыми рисками и должна проводиться только квалифицированными клиницистами в рамках институционально утверждённых протоколов. Разрешение FDA 510(k) для медицинских пиявок ограничено определёнными показаниями; обсуждения исследовательского и нелицензионного применения отмечены соответствующим образом. Для индивидуальных медицинских рекомендаций обратитесь к квалифицированному медицинскому специалисту.