Американское общество гирудотерапии

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: a frequent complication after cardiac surgery

Review published in Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss (2007)

Последнее обновление: June 18, 2026Рецензент: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Narrative reviewРазработка лекарственных препаратовКлинические исследованияPouplard C et al. · Archives des maladies du coeur et des vaisseaux, 2007

Abstract

Thrombocytopenia is a common problem in cardiovascular patients, and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is therefore frequently suspected. Unfractionated heparin during cardiopulmonary bypass is particularly immunogenic as 25% to 50% post-cardiac surgery patients develop heparin-dependent antibodies but only 1 to 3% will develop HIT. These antibodies recognize a 'self protein', platelet factor 4 (PF4), bound to heparin. Antibodies associated with a high risk of HIT are mainly IgG1 which strongly activate platelets and coagulation, thereby causing thrombocytopenia and thrombosis. A biphasic evolution of platelet count with a secondary decrease after a previous increase following CPB or non-recovery of thrombocytopenia within 6 days post-operatively always requires screening for HIT antibodies. Both functional (platelet activation tests) and immunologic assays (antigen assays) are necessary in every patient to establish the diagnosis of HIT. When the clinical probability of HIT is high, the first requirement is to discontinue heparin, without waiting for results of laboratory investigations. An alternative anticoagulant such as danaparoid sodium (Orgaran) or lepirudin (Refludan) must then be administered since heparin withdrawal alone is insufficient to control the prothrombotic state associated with HIT. The risk of HIT will probably soon decrease due to the wider use of fondaparinux, which does not interact in vitro with PF4, but it could remain significant in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with CPB.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal ArticleReview
Indexed MeSH termsAntibodiesAnticoagulantsCardiac Surgical ProceduresChondroitin SulfatesDermatan SulfateHeparinHeparinoidsHeparan SulfateHirudinsHumansImmunoglobulin GPlatelet Factor 4

Резюме

Cardiac surgery HIT review: 25-50% develop heparin-dependent antibodies but only 1-3% develop HIT; danaparoid or lepirudin required to control prothrombotic state.

Почему это важно для гирудотерапии

This review addresses heparin-induced thrombocytopenia as a frequent concern after cardiac surgery, noting that 25–50% of post-cardiac surgery patients develop heparin-dependent antibodies but only 1–3% develop HIT, and describes diagnostic algorithms combining functional and immunologic assays with clinical probability assessment. The abstract explicitly states that alternative anticoagulants including lepirudin (Refludan) must be administered when HIT is clinically probable, as heparin withdrawal alone is insufficient to control the prothrombotic state. This is relevant to ASH's domain because the abstract names lepirudin (Refludan) as a required alternative anticoagulant in a high-risk surgical population, though the abstract itself does not identify lepirudin as hirudin-derived or mention leeches. The caveat is that the abstract focuses on perioperative cardiac surgery management, provides no primary experimental data, and offers no detail on lepirudin-specific pharmacology or outcomes beyond its naming as an alternative agent.

Цитирование

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: a frequent complication after cardiac surgery.

Pouplard C et al. · Archives des maladies du coeur et des vaisseaux, 2007

Связанный клинический контекст

Узнайте, как это исследование связано с клинической практикой

Добавлено в библиотеку ASH: May 27, 2026 · Последнее обновление сайта: June 18, 2026

Этот сайт предоставляет образовательную информацию и не является медицинской консультацией, диагнозом или рекомендацией по лечению. Гирудотерапия сопряжена с клинически значимыми рисками и должна проводиться только квалифицированными клиницистами в рамках институционально утверждённых протоколов. Разрешение FDA 510(k) для медицинских пиявок ограничено определёнными показаниями; обсуждения исследовательского и нелицензионного применения отмечены соответствующим образом. Для индивидуальных медицинских рекомендаций обратитесь к квалифицированному медицинскому специалисту.